Overview

Ant Design

Stacks1.1K

Followers1.7K

Votes224

GitHub Stars96.5K

Forks53.9K

Stencil

Stacks89

Followers110

Votes0

Ant Design vs Stencil: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will highlight the key differences between Ant Design and Stencil.

Integration with Frameworks: Ant Design is primarily designed for React, whereas Stencil is a tool to build Web Components that can be used with any framework or no framework at all. This means that Ant Design offers a more streamlined experience if you are working with React, while Stencil provides more flexibility in terms of framework choice.
Component Library: Ant Design is a comprehensive UI design language with a rich set of pre-designed components aimed at building enterprise-level applications. On the other hand, Stencil is a compiler for building reusable web components. While Stencil provides a solid foundation for creating custom components, it doesn't offer the same level of component library as Ant Design.
CSS Framework: Ant Design comes with its own CSS framework, specifically designed to work with its components. Stencil, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and doesn't provide a built-in CSS framework. This means that when using Stencil, you have the freedom to choose and integrate any CSS framework of your choice.
Tooling and Build Process: Ant Design is a ready-to-use library that you can simply import into your project. It comes with its own build process and requires less configuration. In contrast, Stencil is a toolkit that you use to build, compile, and bundle your own custom components. It provides a more flexible build process but requires more setup and configuration.
Community and Ecosystem: Ant Design has a large and active community, with regular updates, bug fixes, and additional features contributed by the community. It also has a rich ecosystem of related tools and extensions. Stencil, being relatively newer, has a smaller community and ecosystem. While it is growing steadily, the level of community support and available resources may not be as extensive as Ant Design.
Maturity and Adoption: Ant Design has been around for a longer time and is widely adopted by many organizations and developers. It is battle-tested and has a proven track record for building robust and scalable applications. Stencil, on the other hand, is relatively newer and still gaining traction within the web development community. While it shows great potential, its maturity and adoption are yet to reach the same level as Ant Design.

In summary, Ant Design is a React component library with a comprehensive set of pre-designed components, while Stencil is a tool to build web components that can be used with any framework. Ant Design offers integration with React, a built-in CSS framework, and a more streamlined experience, whereas Stencil provides framework flexibility, freedom to choose CSS frameworks, and a more flexible build process. Ant Design has a larger community, a richer ecosystem, and wider adoption, while Stencil shows great potential but is still growing.

Advice on Ant Design, Stencil

vishal

Feb 10, 2021

Needs advice

Which framework should I choose? Features that we are looking for:

Rapid Development
Drag and Drop functionality from Treeview to GridView
Better Performance with large data
Optimal deployment package
Flexible to extend the functionality of any component
Supports Lazy Loading, Multi-column sorting, Column Resizing, Virtual scrolling,

212 views212

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design	Stencil
An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.	Stencil combines some of the best features from traditional frameworks, but outputs 100% standards-compliant Custom Elements, part of the Web Component spec.
Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.	Web Component-based; Asynchronous rendering pipeline; TypeScript support; One-way Data Binding; Component prerendering; Simple component lazy-loading; JSX support; Dependency-free components
Statistics
GitHub Stars 96.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 53.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.1K	Stacks 89
Followers 1.7K	Followers 110
Votes 224	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 48 Lots of components 33 Polished and enterprisey look and feel 21 TypeScript 21 Easy to integrate 18 Es6 support Cons 24 Less 10 Large File Size 4 Poor accessibility support 3 Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React jQuery UI Bootstrap VueStrap	npm Node.js Vue.js React jQuery AngularJS Ember.js

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Stencil?

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.