Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache HTTP Server vs Payara: What are the differences?
Introduction: Apache HTTP Server and Payara are both popular web server solutions used in web development. However, there are key differences between the two that developers should be aware of when choosing the right solution for their projects.
1. Platform Compatibility: Apache HTTP Server is compatible with various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and Unix, while Payara is specifically designed to work best with Java applications and is compatible with Java EE and Jakarta EE specifications. This makes Payara a more specialized and tailored solution for Java-based projects.
2. Features and Functionality: Apache HTTP Server primarily focuses on serving static content and HTML files, while Payara offers more advanced features like clustering, load balancing, and support for JavaServer Pages (JSP) and Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs). Payara's extensive feature set makes it a robust choice for complex enterprise applications.
3. Support and Community: Apache HTTP Server has a large and active open-source community, providing a wealth of resources and support forums for users. On the other hand, Payara offers commercial support and services for enterprise users, ensuring professional assistance and maintenance for critical applications. This difference in support options can be a deciding factor for organizations with specific needs.
4. Deployment and Configuration: Apache HTTP Server is known for its ease of deployment and simple configuration setup, making it a popular choice for beginners and small projects. In contrast, Payara requires a more involved setup process due to its Java EE specifications and advanced features, which may require a higher level of expertise and experience to configure properly.
5. Performance and Scalability: Apache HTTP Server is highly regarded for its performance and scalability, making it a reliable choice for high-traffic websites and applications. Payara, while also capable of supporting large-scale deployments, may require additional configuration and optimization to achieve similar levels of performance as Apache in certain scenarios.
6. Integration with Java EE: Payara is specifically designed to work seamlessly with Java EE specifications and applications, providing native support for technologies like servlets, JavaServer Faces (JSF), and Java Message Service (JMS). This deep integration with Java EE makes Payara a compelling choice for developers working with Java-based enterprise applications.
In Summary, Apache HTTP Server and Payara offer distinct features and functionalities tailored to different types of web development projects, with Apache being versatile and widely compatible, while Payara focuses on Java EE specifications and advanced enterprise features.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
