StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs Zend Server

Apache HTTP Server vs Zend Server

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
Zend Server
Zend Server
Stacks3
Followers5
Votes0

Apache HTTP Server vs Zend Server: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Apache HTTP Server and Zend Server is the scalability. Apache HTTP Server is known for its ability to handle high volumes of web traffic efficiently, making it a popular choice for large websites or applications. On the other hand, Zend Server is optimized for PHP applications, making it a better choice for organizations using PHP-based applications that require scalability.

  2. Monitoring and Management: Zend Server offers advanced monitoring and management tools specifically tailored for PHP applications. These tools provide insights into performance metrics, error tracking, and debugging capabilities that are not available in Apache HTTP Server. This makes Zend Server a better option for organizations looking for in-depth monitoring and management of their PHP applications.

  3. Deployment and Integration: Apache HTTP Server is a general-purpose web server that can be easily deployed on various operating systems and integrated with different technologies. In contrast, Zend Server is specifically designed for PHP applications and comes with built-in features for seamless deployment and integration of PHP applications. This difference makes Zend Server more suitable for organizations focused on PHP development.

  4. Support and Maintenance: Apache HTTP Server being an open-source software offers community support for troubleshooting and maintenance. On the other hand, Zend Server provides professional support services, including updates, patches, and technical assistance tailored for PHP applications. Organizations preferring dedicated support and maintenance may find Zend Server more suitable.

  5. Security Features: Apache HTTP Server provides robust security features to protect web applications from cyber threats and attacks. Zend Server also offers security features but is more focused on PHP application security. Organizations prioritizing PHP application security may choose Zend Server for its tailored security measures.

  6. Cost: The cost structure differs between Apache HTTP Server and Zend Server. Apache HTTP Server is free to use, being an open-source software, while Zend Server comes with licensing fees for its enterprise features and professional support services. Organizations with budget constraints may prefer Apache HTTP Server, while those prioritizing advanced PHP application features and support may opt for Zend Server.

In Summary, Apache HTTP Server and Zend Server differ in scalability, monitoring and management capabilities, deployment and integration ease, support and maintenance options, security features, and cost structure, catering to varying organizational needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Zend Server

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Zend Server
Zend Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

It is a PHP application server trusted by global innovators, including Fortune 100 companies, with easy-to-use tools and comprehensive services

-
Improve Debugging; Boost Security; Streamline Deployments; Simplify Integrations
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
3
Followers
22.8K
Followers
5
Votes
1.4K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Zend Server?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase