StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Apache Sling vs Starlette

Apache Sling vs Starlette

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Sling
Apache Sling
Stacks10
Followers26
Votes0
Starlette
Starlette
Stacks44
Followers21
Votes0

Apache Sling vs Starlette: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Apache Sling and Starlette.

1. **Architecture**: Apache Sling is a web framework that maps HTTP request URLs to resources based on the URL pathname, while Starlette is a lightweight ASGI framework that is designed for building high-performance asynchronous web applications.
2. **Language**: Apache Sling is built using Java, making it a suitable choice for developers who are proficient in Java programming, whereas Starlette is built using Python, making it a preferred option for Python developers. 
3. **Community Support**: Apache Sling is supported by the Apache Software Foundation, which has a large and active community contributing to its development and maintenance. On the other hand, Starlette is an independent project with a smaller community but is known for its fast-growing popularity among Python developers.
4. **Performance**: Apache Sling is optimized for content-centric web applications and provides robust caching mechanisms, while Starlette is focused on handling asynchronous requests efficiently and is suitable for building real-time applications that require high concurrency.
5. **Middleware Support**: Apache Sling offers a wide range of built-in middleware components for handling requests and responses, whereas Starlette follows a minimalist approach and allows developers to choose and integrate middleware components as needed, providing more flexibility in application design.
6. **Scalability**: Apache Sling is known for its scalability and is widely used in enterprise-level applications where high scalability is a requirement, while Starlette, being lightweight and optimized for performance, can also scale well for handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.

In Summary, the key differences between Apache Sling and Starlette lie in their architecture, language compatibility, community support, performance focus, middleware support, and scalability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Sling
Apache Sling
Starlette
Starlette

It is a framework for RESTful web-applications based on an extensible content tree. It maps HTTP request URLs to content resources based on the request's path, extension and selectors. Using convention over configuration, requests are processed by scripts and servlets, dynamically selected based on the current resource. This fosters meaningful URLs and resource driven request processing, while the modular nature of Sling allows for specialized server instances that include only what is needed.

It is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit, which is ideal for building high performance asyncio services.

REST based web framework; Content-driven, using a JCR content repository; Powered by OSGi; Scripting inside, multiple languages (JSP, server-side javascript, Scala, etc.); Apache Open Source project
Seriously impressive performance; WebSocket support; GraphQL support; In-process background tasks; Startup and shutdown events; Test client built on requests; CORS, GZip, Static Files, Streaming responses; Session and Cookie support
Statistics
Stacks
10
Stacks
44
Followers
26
Followers
21
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Scala
Scala
JavaScript
JavaScript
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Apache Sling, Starlette?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase