StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Struts vs JBoss

Apache Struts vs JBoss

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JBoss
JBoss
Stacks457
Followers255
Votes0
Apache Struts
Apache Struts
Stacks61
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks833

Apache Struts vs JBoss: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Apache Struts is a framework for developing MVC-based web applications, while JBoss is an open-source application server that provides a platform for developing and deploying Java EE applications.

  2. Technology Stack: Apache Struts focuses on providing a structured framework for building web applications, including components for handling requests, views, and controllers. JBoss, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of features such as clustering, caching, messaging, and persistence services in addition to supporting Java EE technologies.

  3. Deployment: Apache Struts applications are deployed as WAR files on servlet containers like Tomcat, while JBoss applications are deployed as EAR files on the JBoss application server, providing a more robust and scalable deployment environment.

  4. Scalability: JBoss is designed for enterprise-level scalability and can handle large volumes of traffic and users due to its clustering and load-balancing capabilities. Apache Struts, while scalable, may require additional configurations or third-party tools for handling high traffic volumes effectively.

  5. Community Support: Both Apache Struts and JBoss have active open-source communities that provide support, updates, and plugins. However, JBoss has a larger community and ecosystem due to its broader use as an application server for Java EE applications.

  6. Programming Model: Apache Struts follows the MVC design pattern, separating the application into three components, whereas JBoss supports various programming models such as EJB, JPA, JAX-RS, and JAX-WS, catering to different types of enterprise applications.

In Summary, Apache Struts and JBoss differ in architecture, technology stack, deployment methods, scalability, community support, and programming models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JBoss
JBoss
Apache Struts
Apache Struts

An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

It is a free, open-source, MVC framework for creating elegant, modern Java web applications. It favors convention over configuration, is extensible using a plugin architecture, and ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON.

-
MVC framework; extensible using a plugin architecture; ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
833
Stacks
457
Stacks
61
Followers
255
Followers
57
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
Java
Java
Hibernate
Hibernate

What are some alternatives to JBoss, Apache Struts?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase