StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Apache Wicket vs CUBA Platform

Apache Wicket vs CUBA Platform

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket
Stacks61
Followers54
Votes2
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform
Stacks10
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks216

Apache Wicket vs CUBA Platform: What are the differences?

What is Apache Wicket? *A component-based web application framework for the Java programming language *. It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.

What is CUBA Platform? A full stack Java framework and components for business applications. It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.

Apache Wicket and CUBA Platform can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Some of the features offered by Apache Wicket are:

  • Just Java & HTML
  • Secure by Default
  • AJAX Components

On the other hand, CUBA Platform provides the following key features:

  • Generic user interface
  • Multiple data stores
  • User management

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform

It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.

It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.

Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration
Generic user interface; Multiple data stores; User management; Data access control; Full audit of user actions; Dynamic attributes; File storage; Admin tools; Scheduled tasks; Generic REST API; Single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
216
Stacks
61
Stacks
10
Followers
54
Followers
23
Votes
2
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Component based
Pros
  • 1
    Component based
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Lots out of the box
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JavaScript
JavaScript
HTML5
HTML5
CSS 3
CSS 3
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Java 8
Java 8
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Wicket, CUBA Platform?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase