Apache Wicket vs JHipster

Overview

Apache Wicket

Stacks61

Followers54

Votes2

JHipster

Stacks200

Followers327

Votes0

GitHub Stars22.2K

Forks4.1K

Apache Wicket vs JHipster: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of web development, understanding the key differences between Apache Wicket and JHipster can help developers make informed decisions based on their project requirements.

Application Type: Apache Wicket is a component-based framework that focuses on creating reusable UI components, whereas JHipster is a development platform for generating, developing, and deploying Spring Boot + Angular/React/Vue Web applications. This fundamental difference shapes the architecture and design approach for projects developed using these technologies.
Technology Stack: Apache Wicket primarily relies on Java for server-side development, while JHipster combines Spring Boot for the backend and Angular/React/Vue for the frontend. This difference in technology stack influences the learning curve and potential integrations with other third-party libraries or services.
Community Support: JHipster has a larger and more active community compared to Apache Wicket. The vibrant community around JHipster contributes to a vast array of plugins, extensions, and resources for developers. On the other hand, Apache Wicket's community, though dedicated and helpful, might have limited resources and updates.
Code Generation: JHipster provides scaffolding and code generation capabilities to kickstart projects quickly, generating standard project structures and configurations. Apache Wicket, being a framework, typically requires manual creation of components and pages, potentially leading to a more customizable but slower initial setup process.
Flexibility and Control: Apache Wicket offers a high level of control and flexibility over the UI components and interactions, making it suitable for complex and customized web applications. In contrast, JHipster's opinionated approach and code generation may limit the level of customization but offer rapid development for standard web applications.
Maturity and Stability: Apache Wicket has been around for a longer time and is considered a mature framework with a stable API. JHipster, being a more recent platform, may exhibit changes in its tooling, practices, or community standards as it evolves. This difference in maturity level can influence the long-term support and maintenance of projects built on these technologies.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Apache Wicket and JHipster can aid developers in choosing the right technology stack for their web development projects, balancing considerations like application type, technology stack, community support, code generation, flexibility, and maturity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Wicket	JHipster
It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.	It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.
Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 22.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.1K
Stacks 61	Stacks 200
Followers 54	Followers 327
Votes 2	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Java 1 Component based	No community feedback yet
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA JavaScript HTML5 CSS 3 NetBeans IDE Java 8 Java EE Eclipse	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Wicket, JHipster?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Apache Wicket vs JHipster: What are the differences?

Application Type: Apache Wicket is a component-based framework that focuses on creating reusable UI components, whereas JHipster is a development platform for generating, developing, and deploying Spring Boot + Angular/React/Vue Web applications. This fundamental difference shapes the architecture and design approach for projects developed using these technologies.
Technology Stack: Apache Wicket primarily relies on Java for server-side development, while JHipster combines Spring Boot for the backend and Angular/React/Vue for the frontend. This difference in technology stack influences the learning curve and potential integrations with other third-party libraries or services.
Community Support: JHipster has a larger and more active community compared to Apache Wicket. The vibrant community around JHipster contributes to a vast array of plugins, extensions, and resources for developers. On the other hand, Apache Wicket's community, though dedicated and helpful, might have limited resources and updates.
Code Generation: JHipster provides scaffolding and code generation capabilities to kickstart projects quickly, generating standard project structures and configurations. Apache Wicket, being a framework, typically requires manual creation of components and pages, potentially leading to a more customizable but slower initial setup process.
Flexibility and Control: Apache Wicket offers a high level of control and flexibility over the UI components and interactions, making it suitable for complex and customized web applications. In contrast, JHipster's opinionated approach and code generation may limit the level of customization but offer rapid development for standard web applications.
Maturity and Stability: Apache Wicket has been around for a longer time and is considered a mature framework with a stable API. JHipster, being a more recent platform, may exhibit changes in its tooling, practices, or community standards as it evolves. This difference in maturity level can influence the long-term support and maintenance of projects built on these technologies.

Apache Wicket vs JHipster

Overview