Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ArangoDB vs Redis: What are the differences?
Introduction
ArangoDB and Redis are both popular open-source databases, but they differ in several key aspects. Here are six key differences between them:
Data Models: ArangoDB is a multi-model database that supports multiple data models including key-value, document, and graph. It allows users to choose the most suitable model for their data, providing flexibility and simplicity. On the other hand, Redis is a key-value store, which means it stores and retrieves data based on a unique key. It does not support other data models like document or graph.
Data Persistence: ArangoDB provides persistent storage by default, ensuring data durability and reliability. It stores data on disk and offers various options for data replication and synchronization. Redis, on the other hand, primarily relies on in-memory storage for fast data access. Although it offers mechanisms for persistence, Redis is often used as a caching layer rather than a primary database for persistent data storage.
Queries and Indexing: ArangoDB supports powerful querying capabilities, including standard SQL queries, graph traversals, and full-text search. It provides multiple indexing techniques to optimize query performance. Redis, on the other hand, has limited querying capabilities. It primarily supports simple key-based operations and does not provide advanced querying features or indexing mechanisms.
Scalability and High Availability: ArangoDB is designed for scalability and high availability. It supports horizontal scaling through sharding and replication, allowing users to distribute data across multiple nodes and ensure fault tolerance. Redis, on the other hand, does not natively support sharding or automatic data partitioning. Although Redis can be configured to work in a clustered mode, it requires manual setup and management.
Data Size and Memory Limitations: ArangoDB is suitable for handling both small and large datasets. It does not have any specific limitations on data size or memory usage, as it can efficiently handle terabytes of data. In contrast, Redis has memory limitations as it primarily relies on in-memory storage. The data size in Redis is typically limited by the available memory, and large datasets may require careful memory management or the use of external storage solutions.
Concurrency and Performance: ArangoDB is designed to handle concurrent requests efficiently. It provides transaction support and employs multi-threading to handle multiple requests concurrently. Redis, on the other hand, is known for its excellent performance and low latency. It is optimized for single-threaded performance and excels in scenarios requiring high throughput and low latency, such as caching and real-time data processing.
In summary, ArangoDB offers a multi-model approach with flexible data models, persistent storage, advanced querying capabilities, scalability, and high availability. Redis, on the other hand, focuses on fast in-memory key-value storage, simple operations, and high performance. The choice between ArangoDB and Redis depends on the specific requirements of the application and the data model needed.
Pros of ArangoDB
- Grahps and documents in one DB37
- Intuitive and rich query language26
- Good documentation25
- Open source25
- Joins for collections21
- Foxx is great platform15
- Great out of the box web interface with API playground14
- Good driver support6
- Low maintenance efforts6
- Clustering6
- Easy microservice creation with foxx5
- You can write true backendless apps4
- Managed solution available2
- Performance0
Pros of Redis
- Performance887
- Super fast542
- Ease of use514
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable165
- Free156
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Pub/Sub23
- Great community22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- Lists10
- NoSQL10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Bitmaps8
- Open Source7
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Runs server side LUA4
- Transactions4
- Networked4
- Outstanding performance4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Scalable2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ArangoDB
- Web ui has still room for improvement3
- No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL2
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1