StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ASP.NET Zero vs Play

ASP.NET Zero vs Play

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Play
Play
Stacks752
Followers609
Votes496
GitHub Stars12.6K
Forks4.1K
ASP.NET Zero
ASP.NET Zero
Stacks28
Followers77
Votes41

ASP.NET Zero vs Play: What are the differences?

Developers describe ASP.NET Zero as "Base solution for web applications". It is a starting point for new web applications with modern UI and SOLID architecture. It saves time by providing common application requirements as a pre-built Visual Studio solution (with full source code). On the other hand, Play is detailed as "The High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala". Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

ASP.NET Zero and Play can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Play is an open source tool with 11.5K GitHub stars and 3.86K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Play's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Play
Play
ASP.NET Zero
ASP.NET Zero

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

ASP.NET Zero is a starting point for new web applications with modern UI and SOLID architecture. It saves time by providing common application requirements with pre-built modules/pages as a Visual Studio solution (with full source code).

-
Multi-Tenancy; Authentication & Authorization; Rapid Application Development; Http Api; Mobile Application; Setting Management; Solid Architecture; Based On Strong Frameworks; Based On Metronic Theme; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Automated Testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
752
Stacks
28
Followers
609
Followers
77
Votes
496
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 81
    Scala
  • 55
    Web-friendly architecture
  • 55
    Built on akka
  • 50
    Stateless
  • 47
    High-scalable
Cons
  • 3
    Evolves fast, keep up with releases
  • 1
    Unnecessarily complicated
Pros
  • 4
    Starting point for web applications
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Clean & SOLID architecture
  • 3
    Automates repeated tasks
  • 3
    Premium forum support
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
jQuery
jQuery
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
npm
npm
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
SignalR
SignalR
Entity Framework
Entity Framework
NuGet
NuGet

What are some alternatives to Play, ASP.NET Zero?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase