Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Assemble
Assemble

14
21
+ 1
0
Hugo
Hugo

580
370
+ 1
113
Add tool

Assemble vs Hugo: What are the differences?

Assemble: The static site generator for Node.js, Grunt.js and Yeoman. Most popular site generator for Grunt.js and Yeoman. Assemble is used to build hundreds of web projects, ranging in size from a single page to 14,000 pages (that we're aware of!); Hugo: A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love by spf13 in GoLang. Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Assemble and Hugo can be categorized as "Static Site Generators" tools.

Some of the features offered by Assemble are:

  • Allows you to carve your HTML up into reusable fragments: partials, includes, sections, snippets... Whatever you prefer to call them, Assemble does that.
  • Optionally use layouts to wrap your pages with commonly used elements and content.
  • "Pages" can either be defined as HTML/templates, JSON or YAML, or directly inside the Gruntfile.

On the other hand, Hugo provides the following key features:

  • Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.
  • Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.
  • Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.

Assemble and Hugo are both open source tools. It seems that Hugo with 36K GitHub stars and 4.05K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Assemble with 3.7K GitHub stars and 255 GitHub forks.

What is Assemble?

Most popular site generator for Grunt.js and Yeoman. Assemble is used to build hundreds of web projects, ranging in size from a single page to 14,000 pages (that we're aware of!).

What is Hugo?

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Assemble?
Why do developers choose Hugo?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Assemble?
      What companies use Hugo?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Assemble?
      What tools integrate with Hugo?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Assemble and Hugo?
        Gatsby
        Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.
        Jekyll
        Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
        Hexo
        Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
        VuePress
        A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
        Middleman
        Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Assemble and Hugo
        Josh Dzielak
        Josh Dzielak
        Developer Advocate at DeveloperMode | 4 upvotes 29.1K views
        Jekyll
        Jekyll
        Hugo
        Hugo

        Earlier this year, I migrated my personal website (dzello.com) from Jekyll to Hugo. My goal with the migration was to make the development environment as pleasant as possible and to make it really easy to add new types of content. For example, I knew I wanted to add a consulting page and some portfolio-style pages to show off talks I had given and projects I had worked on.

        I had heard about how fast Hugo was, so I tried it out with my content after using a simple migration tool. The results were impressive - the startup and rebuild times were in milliseconds, making the process of iterating on content or design less cumbersome. Then I started to see how I could use Hugo to create new page types and was very impressed by the flexibility of the content model. It took me a few days to really understand where content should go with Hugo, but then I felt very confident that I could create many different types of pages - even multiple blogs if I wanted - using a consistent syntax and with full control of the layouts and the URLs.

        After about 6 months, I've been very happy with the results of the migration. The dev environment is light and fast and I feel at ease adding new pages and sections to the site.

        See more
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Assemble and Hugo
        No reviews found
        How developers use Assemble and Hugo
        Avatar of Wing Tang Wong
        Wing Tang Wong uses HugoHugo

        The Static Content Generator engine, Hugo, is what I use to convert the Markdown content of my site into HTML for serving to the public.

        Using Hugo as a backend to generate content for a statically hosted frontend reduces the security risk of hosting a dynamically interactive site.

        Avatar of Giant Swarm
        Giant Swarm uses HugoHugo

        We use Hugo to build our documentation website based on Markdown content.

        Avatar of Loog
        Loog uses HugoHugo

        We use Hugo to generate all of our secondary sites including documentation, blog and help center.

        Avatar of Yoandy Rodriguez
        Yoandy Rodriguez uses HugoHugo

        Hugo is my favorite static site generator. It's the engine behind my personal blog.

        Avatar of Zetaops
        Zetaops uses HugoHugo

        REST Backend developed for location data access.

        How much does Assemble cost?
        How much does Hugo cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Assemble
        More news