Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Atlas vs Puma: What are the differences?
What is Atlas? Develop, deploy, and maintain your application anywhere. Use one console and one workflow from development to production. Atlas is one foundation to manage and provide visibility to your servers, containers, VMs, configuration management, service discovery, and additional operations services.
What is Puma? A Modern, Concurrent Web Server for Ruby. Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.
Atlas and Puma are primarily classified as "Infrastructure Build" and "Web Servers" tools respectively.
Puma is an open source tool with 5.79K GitHub stars and 989 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Puma's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Atlas
Pros of Puma
- Free4
- Convenient3
- Easy3
- Multithreaded2
- Consumes less memory than Unicorn2
- Default Rails server2
- First-class support for WebSockets2
- Lightweight1
- Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Atlas
Cons of Puma
- Uses `select` (limited client count)0
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Atlas?
What is Puma?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Atlas?
What companies use Puma?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+39