Atmosphere vs Phoenix Framework

Overview

Atmosphere

Stacks9

Followers20

Votes10

GitHub Stars3.7K

Forks754

Phoenix Framework

Stacks1.0K

Followers1.0K

Votes678

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks3.0K

Atmosphere vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

Atmosphere: Realtime Client Server Framework for the JVM, supporting WebSockets and Cross-Browser Fallbacks Support. The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers; Phoenix Framework: Most web frameworks make you choose between speed and a productive environment. Phoenix gives you both. Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Atmosphere and Phoenix Framework can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

"Cross-Browse" is the top reason why over 2 developers like Atmosphere, while over 100 developers mention "High performance" as the leading cause for choosing Phoenix Framework.

Atmosphere and Phoenix Framework are both open source tools. Phoenix Framework with 14K GitHub stars and 1.76K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Atmosphere with 3.34K GitHub stars and 720 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Atmosphere, Phoenix Framework

Jakes

Mar 21, 2021

Decided

#rust @{#elixir}|topic:null| So am creating a messenger with voice call capabilities app which the user signs up using phone number and so at first i wanted to use Actix so i learned Rust so i thought to myself because well its first i felt its a bit immature to use actix web even though some companies are using Rust but we cant really say the full potential of Rust in a full scale app for example in Discord both Elixir and Rust are used meaning there is equal need for them but for Elixir so many companies use it from Whatsapp, Wechat, etc and this means something for Rust is not ready to go full scale we cant assume all this possibilities when it come Rust. So i decided to go the Erlang way after alot of Thinking so Do you think i made the right decision?Am 19 year programmer so i assume am not experienced as you so your answer or comment would really valuable to me

284k views284k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atmosphere	Phoenix Framework
The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers.	Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.7K	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks 754	GitHub Forks 3.0K
Stacks 9	Stacks 1.0K
Followers 20	Followers 1.0K
Votes 10	Votes 678
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 JVM 3 Cross-Browse 2 WebSockets 2 Open source	Pros 120 High performance 76 Super fast 70 Rapid development 62 Open source 60 Erlang VM Cons 6 No jobs 5 Very difficult
Integrations
Java	Elixir

What are some alternatives to Atmosphere, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

"Cross-Browse" is the top reason why over 2 developers like Atmosphere, while over 100 developers mention "High performance" as the leading cause for choosing Phoenix Framework.

Atmosphere vs Phoenix Framework