StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Aurelia vs Durandal

Aurelia vs Durandal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Durandal
Durandal
Stacks31
Followers36
Votes20
GitHub Stars1.7K
Forks371
Aurelia
Aurelia
Stacks276
Followers294
Votes374
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks613

Aurelia vs Durandal: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Aurelia follows a more modular, component-based architecture while Durandal is based on the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) pattern.
  2. Routing: Aurelia has a more powerful, flexible routing system that supports nested routing, lazy loading, and route params handling compared to Durandal.
  3. Dependency Injection: Aurelia has a built-in dependency injection container, making it easier to manage dependencies and services compared to Durandal, which requires additional libraries for dependency injection.
  4. Templating: Aurelia's templating engine is more robust and supports composing views, custom attributes, and value converters out of the box, while Durandal's templating system may require more manual configurations.
  5. Performance: Aurelia is known for its superior performance, utilizing virtual DOM rendering and two-way binding optimizations, resulting in faster rendering and updating of views compared to Durandal.
  6. Learning Curve: Aurelia has a steeper learning curve due to its complex architecture and advanced features, while Durandal is more straightforward and beginner-friendly, making it easier for new developers to grasp.

In Summary, Aurelia and Durandal differ in architecture, routing capabilities, dependency injection, templating, performance, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Durandal
Durandal
Aurelia
Aurelia

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

JS & HTML modularity; Simple app lifecycle; Eventing, modals, message boxes, etc; Navigation & screen state management;Consistent async programming w/ promises; App bundling and optimization; Use any backend technology; Built on top of jQuery, Knockout & requireJS; Integrates with popular CSS libraries such as Bootstrap and Foundation; Make your own templatable and data-bindable widgets; Fully testable
Two-Way Databinding;Routing & UI Composition;Extensible HTML;MV* with Conventions;Broad Language Support;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.7K
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Forks
371
GitHub Forks
613
Stacks
31
Stacks
276
Followers
36
Followers
294
Votes
20
Votes
374
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    UI components
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 2
    Javascript
  • 2
    Easy to start
  • 2
    Quick to develop
Pros
  • 47
    Simple with conventions
  • 42
    Modern architecture
  • 39
    Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework
  • 31
    Extensible
  • 28
    Integrates well with other components
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Foundation
Foundation
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Durandal, Aurelia?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Chaplin

Chaplin

Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase