Aurelia vs Espresso.js: What are the differences?
Some of the features offered by Aurelia are:
- Two-Way Databinding
- Routing & UI Composition
- Extensible HTML
On the other hand, Espresso.js provides the following key features:
- tiny, less than 500 lines and 3kb gzipped
- zero dependencies
- performance and memory focused
Aurelia and Espresso.js are both open source tools. Aurelia with 11.1K GitHub stars and 665 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Espresso.js with 523 GitHub stars and 20 GitHub forks.
What is Aurelia?
What is Espresso.js?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Espresso.js?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Aurelia?
What are the cons of using Espresso.js?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
At Beamery we had a large, AngularJS app, built over several years. Our clients were happy, but we were not. We had several problems: Building new features was slow. AngularJS doesn’t scale nicely. Features clash with each other. Isolation doesn’t come as standard, you have to work hard to keep features separate. It takes time to get it right. #Hiring was hard, for all the reasons listed above. The app was slower than it needed to be because AngularJS was never built for speed. We wanted to render half a million contacts, and Angular was fighting us all the way.
As time went by it become harder to find developers who would willingly choose AngularJS over React Angular 2 , Vue.js , Aurelia or Polymer .
So we faced a choice. We could throw it all away and start again, we could upgrade to Angular 5, or the awesome option - we could use micro frontends. We chose the awesome option.
The only one framework for me that capable to beat laravel nowadays. But for me both were awesome! Anyone had tried integrating this both framework?
Provides all services need to create modern Single Page Apps. The user interface is build on top of that