Aurelia vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?
Some of the features offered by Aurelia are:
- Two-Way Databinding
- Routing & UI Composition
- Extensible HTML
On the other hand, Semantic UI provides the following key features:
- Build Responsive Layouts Easier
- Self Explanatory
- Tag ambivalent
"Simple with conventions" is the top reason why over 38 developers like Aurelia, while over 134 developers mention "Easy to use and looks elegant" as the leading cause for choosing Semantic UI.
Aurelia and Semantic UI are both open source tools. Semantic UI with 45.7K GitHub stars and 4.83K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Aurelia with 11K GitHub stars and 666 GitHub forks.
Snapchat, Create.It, and Reviewable are some of the popular companies that use Semantic UI, whereas Aurelia is used by NOD studios, Strengthen, and SupplyPike. Semantic UI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 77 company stacks & 50 developers stacks; compared to Aurelia, which is listed in 17 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.
What is Aurelia?
What is Semantic UI?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Aurelia?
What are the cons of using Semantic UI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling
import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.
React Helmet was chosen to handle
<head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct
<title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.
<style> tags when using #StyledComponents.
React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.
Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.
At Beamery we had a large, AngularJS app, built over several years. Our clients were happy, but we were not. We had several problems: Building new features was slow. AngularJS doesn’t scale nicely. Features clash with each other. Isolation doesn’t come as standard, you have to work hard to keep features separate. It takes time to get it right. #Hiring was hard, for all the reasons listed above. The app was slower than it needed to be because AngularJS was never built for speed. We wanted to render half a million contacts, and Angular was fighting us all the way.
As time went by it become harder to find developers who would willingly choose AngularJS over React Angular 2 , Vue.js , Aurelia or Polymer .
So we faced a choice. We could throw it all away and start again, we could upgrade to Angular 5, or the awesome option - we could use micro frontends. We chose the awesome option.
The only one framework for me that capable to beat laravel nowadays. But for me both were awesome! Anyone had tried integrating this both framework?
We use Semantic UI for our frotend. A heavily customised version of it, but still Semantic UI under the hood.
Used Semantic UI + Angular2 together with Spring or Node/Express for full stack web application development.
Provides all services need to create modern Single Page Apps. The user interface is build on top of that