Autogit vs git-bug

Overview

git-bug

Stacks1

Followers12

Votes0

Autogit

Stacks0

Followers6

Votes0

GitHub Stars470

Forks21

Autogit vs git-bug: What are the differences?

Developers describe Autogit as "Automatically execute commands across multiple Git repos". Define commands, using plugins, to execute across all your repositories. Autogit allows you to automate many tedious tasks. On the other hand, git-bug is detailed as "Distributed bug tracker embedded in Git". git-bug is a distributed bug tracker embedded in git. It uses git's internal storage so no files are added in your project. As you would do with commits and branches, you can push your bugs to the same git remote you are already using to collaborate with other people.

Autogit and git-bug belong to "Git Tools" category of the tech stack.

Autogit and git-bug are both open source tools. It seems that git-bug with 3.11K GitHub stars and 84 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Autogit with 433 GitHub stars and 14 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Version Control on StackShare

Git Version Control

Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

184k

Detailed Comparison

git-bug	Autogit
git-bug is a distributed bug tracker embedded in git. It uses git's internal storage so no files are added in your project. As you would do with commits and branches, you can push your bugs to the same git remote you are already using to collaborate with other people.	Define commands, using plugins, to execute across all your repositories. Autogit allows you to automate many tedious tasks.
-	Pull/push to/from origin, across all your repositories, with one command.;Edit multiple readmes and have autogit make the commits and pushing them, maybe even bumping the projects' versions and publishing them.;Synchronize all your repositories' descriptions and keywords with GitHub.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 470
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 21
Stacks 1	Stacks 0
Followers 12	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Git	Git

What are some alternatives to git-bug, Autogit?

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.