Avalonia vs Crosswalk

Overview

Crosswalk

Stacks16

Followers34

Votes6

GitHub Stars2.3K

Forks651

Avalonia

Stacks28

Followers113

Votes0

GitHub Stars29.1K

Forks2.5K

Avalonia vs Crosswalk: What are the differences?

Avalonia and Crosswalk are both frameworks used for developing user interfaces in various applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Architecture: Avalonia uses a cross-platform UI framework that allows developers to create modern, reactive interfaces, while Crosswalk is a web runtime platform that enables the embedding of web content into applications. This means that Avalonia is more suited for building native-like interfaces, while Crosswalk focuses on integrating web technologies into applications.
Supported Platforms: Avalonia supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it highly versatile for cross-platform development. On the other hand, Crosswalk primarily targets Android and iOS platforms, limiting its availability for other operating systems.
Tooling and Ecosystem: Avalonia has a growing and active community, which leads to an increasing number of tools, libraries, and extensions being developed to support the framework. Crosswalk, on the other hand, has a more limited ecosystem, as it is primarily used for embedding web content rather than providing a comprehensive UI development framework.
Performance and Efficiency: Avalonia offers high-performance rendering and efficient memory management, resulting in smooth and responsive user interfaces. Crosswalk, as a web runtime platform, relies on web technologies for rendering and may experience performance limitations compared to more native-like approaches.
Compatibility and Integration: Avalonia provides seamless integration with existing UI frameworks like WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation), allowing for easier migration of projects. Crosswalk, on the other hand, focuses on web technologies and may require additional effort for integration with more native-oriented frameworks.
Development Flexibility: Avalonia offers XAML-based UI definition, which provides a flexible and familiar development experience for developers who are already familiar with XAML. Crosswalk, being a web runtime platform, utilizes web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it suitable for developers with web development skills.

In Summary, Avalonia and Crosswalk differ in terms of architecture, platform support, tooling and ecosystem, performance, compatibility, and development flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Crosswalk	Avalonia
Crosswalk is a web runtime for ambitious HTML5 applications. All the features of a modern browser, deep device integration and an API for adding native extensions	Avalonia is a multi-platform windowing toolkit - somewhat like WPF - that is intended to be multi- platform. It supports XAML, lookless controls and a flexible styling system, and runs on Windows using Direct2D and other operating systems using Gtk & Cairo.
Develop around device fragmentation;Provide a feature rich experience on all Android 4.x devices;Easily debug with Chrome DevTools;Improve the performance of your HTML, CSS, and JavaScript	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.3K	GitHub Stars 29.1K
GitHub Forks 651	GitHub Forks 2.5K
Stacks 16	Stacks 28
Followers 34	Followers 113
Votes 6	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Essential for Android hybrid apps 1 Improved performance 1 Hybrid desktop apps 1 New Modern Cordova 1 Pretty decent solution to Android WebView issues	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Android SDK	.NET

What are some alternatives to Crosswalk, Avalonia?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Avalonia vs Crosswalk: What are the differences?

Avalonia and Crosswalk are both frameworks used for developing user interfaces in various applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

Architecture: Avalonia uses a cross-platform UI framework that allows developers to create modern, reactive interfaces, while Crosswalk is a web runtime platform that enables the embedding of web content into applications. This means that Avalonia is more suited for building native-like interfaces, while Crosswalk focuses on integrating web technologies into applications.
Supported Platforms: Avalonia supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it highly versatile for cross-platform development. On the other hand, Crosswalk primarily targets Android and iOS platforms, limiting its availability for other operating systems.
Tooling and Ecosystem: Avalonia has a growing and active community, which leads to an increasing number of tools, libraries, and extensions being developed to support the framework. Crosswalk, on the other hand, has a more limited ecosystem, as it is primarily used for embedding web content rather than providing a comprehensive UI development framework.
Performance and Efficiency: Avalonia offers high-performance rendering and efficient memory management, resulting in smooth and responsive user interfaces. Crosswalk, as a web runtime platform, relies on web technologies for rendering and may experience performance limitations compared to more native-like approaches.
Compatibility and Integration: Avalonia provides seamless integration with existing UI frameworks like WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation), allowing for easier migration of projects. Crosswalk, on the other hand, focuses on web technologies and may require additional effort for integration with more native-oriented frameworks.
Development Flexibility: Avalonia offers XAML-based UI definition, which provides a flexible and familiar development experience for developers who are already familiar with XAML. Crosswalk, being a web runtime platform, utilizes web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it suitable for developers with web development skills.

In Summary, Avalonia and Crosswalk differ in terms of architecture, platform support, tooling and ecosystem, performance, compatibility, and development flexibility.