StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Avalonia vs Flutter

Avalonia vs Flutter

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Avalonia
Avalonia
Stacks28
Followers113
Votes0
GitHub Stars29.1K
Forks2.5K
Flutter
Flutter
Stacks17.7K
Followers16.8K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars173.7K
Forks29.4K

Avalonia vs Flutter: What are the differences?

Introduction

Avalonia and Flutter are both frameworks used for building user interfaces for desktop and mobile applications, respectively. While they serve the same purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Platform Support:

    • Avalonia: Avalonia primarily targets desktop platforms like Windows, macOS, and Linux.
    • Flutter: Flutter, on the other hand, is designed for mobile platforms like iOS and Android, but also supports desktop platforms through experimental projects like Flutter Desktop.
  2. Programming Languages:

    • Avalonia: Avalonia is primarily written in C# and uses the .NET runtime, allowing developers to leverage their existing knowledge of the C# programming language and the extensive .NET ecosystem.
    • Flutter: Flutter uses Dart as its primary programming language. While it may require developers to learn a new language, Dart offers a range of powerful features and tools designed specifically for building cross-platform apps.
  3. Rendering Engines:

    • Avalonia: Avalonia relies on native windowing systems and graphic libraries to render the user interface, resulting in a more native look and feel. It also provides GPU-acceleration for better performance.
    • Flutter: Flutter uses its own rendering engine called Skia, which allows it to render UI components consistently across platforms. This approach provides high performance and enables the creation of custom UI designs.
  4. Widget Hierarchy:

    • Avalonia: Avalonia utilizes a tree-based approach for building user interfaces, where controls are nested within parent controls to create a hierarchy. This provides flexibility in structuring complex layouts.
    • Flutter: Flutter uses a widget-based approach, where each UI component, called a widget, is self-contained and can be easily composed and reused. This allows for a more modular and flexible architecture.
  5. State Management:

    • Avalonia: Avalonia provides various options for managing state, including ReactiveUI and MVVM patterns, allowing developers to choose the approach that best suits their needs.
    • Flutter: Flutter has built-in support for a single, global state management solution called "Flutter Provider". It makes it easy to manage state across the entire application, resulting in simpler and more maintainable code.
  6. UI Customization:

    • Avalonia: Avalonia provides a wide range of control customization options, including styles, themes, and templates, allowing developers to create unique, branded UI designs.
    • Flutter: Flutter offers a rich set of customizable widgets, as well as the ability to create custom widgets and animations, making it easy to achieve visually appealing and engaging UI designs.

In summary, the key differences between Avalonia and Flutter lie in their platform support, programming languages, rendering engines, widget hierarchy, state management approaches, and UI customization options. These factors impact the development process and the resulting user interface experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Avalonia, Flutter

Nick
Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k
Comments
Thuan
Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided
  • Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
  • Easy to learn & deployed production
  • Fast development
  • Strong community
  • Completed Documents
  • Native performance with lower RAM used.
  • Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
  • Powered by Facebook.
666k views666k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Avalonia
Avalonia
Flutter
Flutter

Avalonia is a multi-platform windowing toolkit - somewhat like WPF - that is intended to be multi- platform. It supports XAML, lookless controls and a flexible styling system, and runs on Windows using Direct2D and other operating systems using Gtk & Cairo.

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

-
Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.1K
GitHub Stars
173.7K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
29.4K
Stacks
28
Stacks
17.7K
Followers
113
Followers
16.8K
Votes
0
Votes
1.2K
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 149
    Hot Reload
  • 126
    Cross platform
  • 107
    Performance
  • 90
    Backed by Google
  • 74
    Compiled into Native Code
Cons
  • 29
    Need to learn Dart
  • 11
    Lack of community support
  • 10
    No 3D Graphics Engine Support
  • 8
    Graphics programming
  • 6
    Lack of friendly documentation
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Android SDK
Android SDK
Firebase
Firebase
Dart
Dart

What are some alternatives to Avalonia, Flutter?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase