AWS Firecracker vs Zappa: What are the differences?
Developers describe AWS Firecracker as "Secure and fast microVMs for serverless computing". Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services that provide serverless operational models. Firecracker runs workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs, which combine the security and isolation properties provided by hardware virtualization technology with the speed and flexibility of containers. On the other hand, Zappa is detailed as "Deploy all Python WSGI applications on AWS Lambda + API Gateway". Zappa makes it super easy to deploy all Python WSGI applications on AWS Lambda + API Gateway. Think of it as "serverless" web hosting for your Python web apps. That means infinite scaling, zero downtime, zero maintenance - and at a fraction of the cost of your current deployments!.
AWS Firecracker and Zappa can be primarily classified as "Serverless / Task Processing" tools.
AWS Firecracker is an open source tool with 8.6K GitHub stars and 521 GitHub forks. Here's a link to AWS Firecracker's open source repository on GitHub.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AWS Firecracker?
What is Zappa?
What companies use AWS Firecracker?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions