AWS WAF vs Cisco WSA

Overview

AWS WAF

Stacks164

Followers191

Votes0

Cisco WSA

Stacks6

Followers19

Votes0

AWS WAF vs Cisco WSA: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will discuss the key differences between AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) and Cisco WSA (Web Security Appliance).

Deployment Method: AWS WAF is a cloud-based service provided by Amazon Web Services, which allows customers to protect their web applications using a distributed network of cloud-based servers. On the other hand, Cisco WSA is a physical or virtual appliance that is deployed on-premises within the customer's network environment.
Scalability: AWS WAF offers virtually unlimited scalability by utilizing the power of cloud computing, allowing customers to easily scale their protection as their web traffic grows. In contrast, Cisco WSA has limitations on scalability as it is tied to the capacity of the physical or virtual appliance deployed on-premises.
Maintenance and Updates: With AWS WAF, all maintenance and updates are managed by Amazon Web Services, eliminating the need for the customer to perform any manual maintenance tasks. On the contrary, Cisco WSA requires the customer to regularly update and maintain the appliance to ensure it is up-to-date with the latest security patches and features.
Integration with Cloud Services: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, and AWS Shield, providing a comprehensive security solution for web applications deployed in the AWS ecosystem. Cisco WSA, on the other hand, is primarily designed to integrate with on-premises infrastructure and may require additional configuration and integration efforts to work with cloud-based services.
Centralized Management: AWS WAF offers a centralized management console, allowing customers to easily configure, monitor, and manage their web application firewall policies across multiple applications and environments. Cisco WSA also provides centralized management capabilities but typically requires additional software or management platforms to achieve a similar level of centralized control.
Pricing Model: AWS WAF follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers are charged based on their actual usage of the service. Cisco WSA, on the other hand, typically follows a traditional upfront licensing model, where customers need to purchase licenses based on their estimated capacity requirements.

In Summary, AWS WAF and Cisco WSA differ in terms of deployment method, scalability, maintenance and updates, integration with cloud services, centralized management, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS WAF	Cisco WSA
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.	Advanced threats can hide on legitimate websites. Users may inadvertently put your organization at risk by clicking where they shouldn't. It protects you by automatically blocking risky sites and testing unknown sites before allowing users to click on them.
-	Strong, effective protection; Granular controls; Detailed reporting; Flexible deployment options; Integrated security architecture
Statistics
Stacks 164	Stacks 6
Followers 191	Followers 19
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to AWS WAF, Cisco WSA?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

AWS WAF vs Cisco WSA: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will discuss the key differences between AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) and Cisco WSA (Web Security Appliance).

Deployment Method: AWS WAF is a cloud-based service provided by Amazon Web Services, which allows customers to protect their web applications using a distributed network of cloud-based servers. On the other hand, Cisco WSA is a physical or virtual appliance that is deployed on-premises within the customer's network environment.
Scalability: AWS WAF offers virtually unlimited scalability by utilizing the power of cloud computing, allowing customers to easily scale their protection as their web traffic grows. In contrast, Cisco WSA has limitations on scalability as it is tied to the capacity of the physical or virtual appliance deployed on-premises.
Maintenance and Updates: With AWS WAF, all maintenance and updates are managed by Amazon Web Services, eliminating the need for the customer to perform any manual maintenance tasks. On the contrary, Cisco WSA requires the customer to regularly update and maintain the appliance to ensure it is up-to-date with the latest security patches and features.
Integration with Cloud Services: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, AWS Elastic Load Balancing, and AWS Shield, providing a comprehensive security solution for web applications deployed in the AWS ecosystem. Cisco WSA, on the other hand, is primarily designed to integrate with on-premises infrastructure and may require additional configuration and integration efforts to work with cloud-based services.
Centralized Management: AWS WAF offers a centralized management console, allowing customers to easily configure, monitor, and manage their web application firewall policies across multiple applications and environments. Cisco WSA also provides centralized management capabilities but typically requires additional software or management platforms to achieve a similar level of centralized control.
Pricing Model: AWS WAF follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers are charged based on their actual usage of the service. Cisco WSA, on the other hand, typically follows a traditional upfront licensing model, where customers need to purchase licenses based on their estimated capacity requirements.

In Summary, AWS WAF and Cisco WSA differ in terms of deployment method, scalability, maintenance and updates, integration with cloud services, centralized management, and pricing model.