StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Azure Service Fabric vs Conductor

Azure Service Fabric vs Conductor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Stacks103
Followers284
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks399
Conductor
Conductor
Stacks66
Followers122
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.8K
Forks2.3K

Azure Service Fabric vs Conductor: What are the differences?

Developers describe Azure Service Fabric as "Distributed systems platform that simplifies build, package, deploy, and management of scalable microservices apps". Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps. On the other hand, Conductor is detailed as "*A microservices orchestration engine that runs in the cloud *". Conductor is an orchestration engine that runs in the cloud.

Azure Service Fabric and Conductor can be primarily classified as "Microservices" tools.

Some of the features offered by Azure Service Fabric are:

  • Simplify microservices development and application lifecycle management
  • Reliably scale and orchestrate containers and microservices
  • Data-aware platform for low-latency, high-throughput workloads with stateful containers or microservices

On the other hand, Conductor provides the following key features:

  • Allow creating complex process / business flows in which individual task is implemented by a microservice.
  • A JSON DSL based blueprint defines the execution flow.
  • Provide visibility and traceability into the these process flows.

Azure Service Fabric and Conductor are both open source tools. Azure Service Fabric with 2.57K GitHub stars and 304 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Conductor with 1.91K GitHub stars and 572 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Conductor
Conductor

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Conductor is an orchestration engine that runs in the cloud.

Simplify microservices development and application lifecycle management; Reliably scale and orchestrate containers and microservices; Data-aware platform for low-latency, high-throughput workloads with stateful containers or microservices; Run anything – your choice of languages and programming models; Run anywhere – supports Windows/Linux in Azure, on-premises, or other clouds; Scales up to thousands of machines
Allow creating complex process / business flows in which individual task is implemented by a microservice.;A JSON DSL based blueprint defines the execution flow.;Provide visibility and traceability into the these process flows.;Expose control semantics around pause, resume, restart, etc allowing for better devops experience.;Allow greater reuse of existing microservices providing an easier path for onboarding.;User interface to visualize the process flows.;Ability to synchronously process all the tasks when needed.;Ability to scale millions of concurrently running process flows.;Backed by a queuing service abstracted from the clients.;Be able to operate on HTTP or other transports e.g. gRPC.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Stars
12.8K
GitHub Forks
399
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
103
Stacks
66
Followers
284
Followers
122
Votes
26
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Intelligent, fast, reliable
  • 4
    Runs most of Azure core services
  • 3
    More reliable than Kubernetes
  • 3
    Reliability
  • 3
    Open source
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Azure Service Fabric, Conductor?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana