StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Azure Storage vs Realm React Native

Azure Storage vs Realm React Native

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52
Realm React Native
Realm React Native
Stacks45
Followers167
Votes1
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks607

Azure Storage vs Realm React Native: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Azure Storage and Realm React Native are both popular technologies used for data storage and management in mobile applications. While both serve similar purposes, they have key differences that developers must consider based on their specific requirements.

  1. Storage Type: Azure Storage is a cloud-based storage solution that offers different types of storage services such as Blob storage, Table storage, Queue storage, and File storage. On the other hand, Realm React Native is a mobile database that stores data locally on the device using an embedded database engine.

  2. Data Synchronization: Azure Storage provides data replication and synchronization across multiple data centers for high availability and durability. In contrast, Realm React Native offers real-time data synchronization between the local database on the device and a remote database, facilitating seamless data updates and access from different devices.

  3. Scalability: Azure Storage is highly scalable and supports massive amounts of data with the ability to automatically scale resources based on demand. Realm React Native, on the other hand, is designed for embedded mobile databases, which may not be as scalable as cloud-based solutions like Azure Storage.

  4. Data Security: Azure Storage provides robust security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access control, and integration with Azure Active Directory for authentication. Realm React Native also offers encryption for data stored on the device but may require additional measures to ensure data security when synchronizing with a remote database.

  5. Development Flexibility: Azure Storage can be integrated with a wide range of programming languages and platforms, making it suitable for diverse application development scenarios. Realm React Native, on the other hand, is specifically designed for React Native applications, providing a streamlined development experience but limiting its compatibility with other frameworks.

  6. Cost Considerations: Azure Storage offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, storage capacity, and data transfers, allowing developers to optimize costs according to their needs. Realm React Native, on the other hand, is a commercial product with licensing fees based on the number of users or devices, which may impact cost considerations for large-scale applications.

In Summary, Azure Storage and Realm React Native differ in storage type, data synchronization, scalability, data security, development flexibility, and cost considerations, making it essential for developers to evaluate these factors when choosing the right technology for their mobile applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Realm React Native
Realm React Native

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Realm JavaScript enables you to efficiently write your app’s model layer in a safe, persisted and fast way. It’s designed to work with React Native and Node.js.

Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
607
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
45
Followers
787
Followers
167
Votes
52
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cost-effective
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
Pros
  • 1
    Reactive Database
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
React Native
React Native

What are some alternatives to Azure Storage, Realm React Native?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

Realm

Realm

The Realm Mobile Platform is a next-generation data layer for applications. Realm is reactive, concurrent, and lightweight, allowing you to work with live, native objects.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase