Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Storage
Azure Storage

335
240
+ 1
42
Sidekiq
Sidekiq

807
379
+ 1
403
Add tool

Azure Storage vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Developers describe Azure Storage as "Reliable, economical cloud storage for data big and small". Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud. On the other hand, Sidekiq is detailed as "Simple, efficient background processing for Ruby". Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Azure Storage can be classified as a tool in the "Cloud Storage" category, while Sidekiq is grouped under "Background Processing".

"All-in-one storage solution" is the primary reason why developers consider Azure Storage over the competitors, whereas "Simple" was stated as the key factor in picking Sidekiq.

Sidekiq is an open source tool with 9.66K GitHub stars and 1.66K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Sidekiq's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Sidekiq has a broader approval, being mentioned in 346 company stacks & 77 developers stacks; compared to Azure Storage, which is listed in 82 company stacks and 42 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Azure Storage?

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

What is Sidekiq?

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Azure Storage?
Why do developers choose Sidekiq?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Azure Storage?
      What companies use Sidekiq?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Azure Storage?
      What tools integrate with Sidekiq?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Azure Storage and Sidekiq?
      Azure Redis Cache
      It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.
      Amazon S3
      Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
      Azure Cosmos DB
      Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.
      Google Cloud Storage
      Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.
      Amazon EBS
      Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Azure Storage and Sidekiq
      Jerome Dalbert
      Jerome Dalbert
      Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare | 4 upvotes 21.4K views
      atGratify CommerceGratify Commerce
      Amazon SQS
      Amazon SQS
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Sidekiq
      Sidekiq
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      Rails
      Rails
      delayed_job
      delayed_job
      #BackgroundProcessing

      delayed_job is a great Rails background job library for new projects, as it only uses what you already have: a relational database. We happily used it during the company鈥檚 first two years.

      But it started to falter as our web and database transactions significantly grew. Our app interacted with users via SMS texts sent inside background jobs. Because the delayed_job daemon ran every couple seconds, this meant that users often waited several long seconds before getting text replies, which was not acceptable. Moreover, job processing was done inside AWS Elastic Beanstalk web instances, which were already under stress and not meant to handle jobs.

      We needed a fast background job system that could process jobs in near real-time and integrate well with AWS. Sidekiq is a fast and popular Ruby background job library, but it does not leverage the Elastic Beanstalk worker architecture, and you have to maintain a Redis instance.

      We ended up choosing active-elastic-job, which seamlessly integrates with worker instances and Amazon SQS. SQS is a fast queue and you don鈥檛 need to worry about infrastructure or scaling, as AWS handles it for you.

      We noticed significant performance gains immediately after making the switch.

      #BackgroundProcessing

      See more
      Jerome Dalbert
      Jerome Dalbert
      Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare | 3 upvotes 7.7K views
      atStackShareStackShare
      Redis
      Redis
      delayed_job
      delayed_job
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Sidekiq
      Sidekiq

      We use Sidekiq to process millions of Ruby background jobs a day under normal loads. We sometimes process more than that when running one-off backfill tasks.

      With so many jobs, it wouldn't really make sense to use delayed_job, as it would put our main database under unnecessary load, which would make it a bottleneck with most DB queries serving jobs and not end users. I suppose you could create a separate DB just for jobs, but that can be a hassle. Sidekiq uses a separate Redis instance so you don't have this problem. And it is very performant!

      I also like that its free version comes "batteries included" with:

      • A web monitoring UI that provides some nice stats.
      • An API that can come in handy for one-off tasks, like changing the queue of certain already enqueued jobs.

      Sidekiq is a pleasure to use. All our engineers love it!

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Azure Storage and Sidekiq
      Review ofSidekiqSidekiq

      Pretty good post. I found your website perfect for my needs bullet force

      How developers use Azure Storage and Sidekiq
      Avatar of SmartLogic
      SmartLogic uses SidekiqSidekiq

      We turn to Sidekiq when we need to run background jobs in a Rails app, which we do for just about every Rails app we write. We especially like the ops tools that come with Sidekiq, which make it easy to monitor and maintain.

      Avatar of Tim Lucas
      Tim Lucas uses SidekiqSidekiq

      Background processing of Pushover push notifications to admins when sales occur, payments processing via Pin Payments, Campaign Monitor transaction email sending, and Intercom event API posting.

      Avatar of Told
      Told uses SidekiqSidekiq

      Sidekiq is used extensively for a multitude of background jobs, everything from audio/video post-processing to sending push notifications.

      Avatar of Jeff Flynn
      Jeff Flynn uses SidekiqSidekiq

      We offload our background processing tasks (photo sizing, watermarking, etc.) to Sidekiq to keep our app's performance optimal.

      Avatar of Seen on Set
      Seen on Set uses Azure StorageAzure Storage

      We use Azure Blob Storage for hosting all images on the Seen on Set website. These images are then geo-cached using Azure CDN.

      Avatar of Foundbite
      Foundbite uses Azure StorageAzure Storage

      We use Azure Storage to store all foundbite images and sound. Azure Storage is super easy to use and really cheap.

      Avatar of Dirk Eisenberg
      Dirk Eisenberg uses Azure StorageAzure Storage

      Azure Storage is used as a scalable NoSQL storage to prevent bottlenecks when the amount of data is growing.

      Avatar of nextdocdev
      nextdocdev uses Azure StorageAzure Storage

      Storage documents e historicals informations about the documents

      Avatar of Yonas B.
      Yonas B. uses Azure StorageAzure Storage

      I used Azure's blob storage to store large unstructured data.

      How much does Azure Storage cost?
      How much does Sidekiq cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Azure Storage
      More news