StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Azure Synapse vs Google Cloud Data Fusion

Azure Synapse vs Google Cloud Data Fusion

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Data Fusion
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Stacks25
Followers156
Votes1
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Azure Synapse vs Google Cloud Data Fusion: What are the differences?

# Azure Synapse vs Google Cloud Data Fusion

Azure Synapse and Google Cloud Data Fusion are both powerful cloud-based data integration and analytics platforms. While they both offer similar capabilities, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Azure Synapse focuses on providing a seamless data integration solution for both structured and unstructured data across various sources, allowing users to easily ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data. On the other hand, Google Cloud Data Fusion is more oriented towards visual ETL and ELT workflows, making it easier for users to transform and analyze data without writing code.

2. **Pricing Structure**: Azure Synapse follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the resources they consume on a per-minute basis. In contrast, Google Cloud Data Fusion offers a subscription-based pricing model, which may be more cost-effective for users with predictable workloads.

3. **Ecosystem Integration**: Azure Synapse seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft Azure services, such as Azure Data Lake Storage, Azure Data Factory, and Azure SQL Data Warehouse, providing a cohesive data analytics environment. Google Cloud Data Fusion, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with the Google Cloud ecosystem, including BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub, making it a preferred choice for organizations using Google Cloud services.

4. **Supported Data Sources**: Azure Synapse supports a wide range of data sources, including Azure Blob Storage, SQL Server, Oracle, and SAP HANA, enabling users to easily connect and work with diverse data sets. Google Cloud Data Fusion also supports multiple data sources, including Google BigQuery, Google Cloud Storage, MySQL, and PostgreSQL, providing users with the flexibility to work with data from various systems.

5. **Scalability and Performance**: Azure Synapse is known for its high scalability and performance, allowing users to process large volumes of data with minimal latency. Google Cloud Data Fusion, on the other hand, offers scalable data processing capabilities, making it suitable for handling complex data workflows with efficiency.

6. **Security and Compliance**: Azure Synapse provides robust security features, including encryption, access control, and compliance certifications, ensuring that data remains secure and compliant with industry standards. Google Cloud Data Fusion also offers advanced security measures, such as data encryption and identity and access management, to protect sensitive data and ensure regulatory compliance.

In Summary, Azure Synapse and Google Cloud Data Fusion offer powerful data integration and analytics capabilities, but users should consider factors such as integration capabilities, pricing structure, ecosystem integration, supported data sources, scalability and performance, and security and compliance when selecting the appropriate platform for their data processing needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Data Fusion
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

A fully managed, cloud-native data integration service that helps users efficiently build and manage ETL/ELT data pipelines. With a graphical interface and a broad open-source library of preconfigured connectors and transformations, and more.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Code-free self-service; Collaborative data engineering; GCP-native; Enterprise-grade security; Integration metadata and lineage; Seamless operations; Comprehensive integration toolkit; Hybrid enablement
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
Stacks
25
Stacks
104
Followers
156
Followers
230
Votes
1
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Lower total cost of pipeline ownership
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
  • 1
    Concurrency
Integrations
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Data Fusion, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase