StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Backbone.js vs Handlebars.js

Backbone.js vs Handlebars.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Stacks7.5K
Followers3.5K
Votes675
GitHub Stars28.1K
Forks5.3K
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308

Backbone.js vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Backbone.js and Handlebars.js.

1. **Architecture**:
Backbone.js is a client-side framework that follows the MVC design pattern, providing models, views, and collections to organize data. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a templating library that focuses on the presentation layer by providing a simple way to generate HTML using templates.

2. **Data Binding**:
Backbone.js offers two-way data binding, allowing changes in the model to automatically update the corresponding views and vice versa. Handlebars.js, in contrast, does not have built-in data binding and requires external libraries or frameworks to achieve this functionality.

3. **Dependencies**:
Backbone.js has dependencies on Underscore.js and jQuery to provide utility functions and DOM manipulation. Handlebars.js, being a standalone library, has fewer dependencies and can be integrated into projects easily without additional libraries.

4. **Template Syntax**:
Backbone.js uses Underscore.js-style templates with a mix of HTML and JavaScript, which can sometimes be cumbersome for beginners. Handlebars.js uses a simple syntax with double curly braces {{ }} for placeholders and #each loops, making it more user-friendly for creating dynamic templates.

5. **Client-side Rendering**:
Backbone.js focuses on structuring the client-side application logic, including data models, collections, and views, while leaving the rendering to the developer's preference. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, specializes in client-side rendering by efficiently updating the DOM based on data changes through template compilation.

6. **Custom Helpers**:
Handlebars.js allows developers to create custom helpers to extend the functionality of templates, enabling complex logic and additional features within templates. Backbone.js, being a framework, does not provide a built-in mechanism for creating custom template helpers.

# Summary
In summary, Backbone.js is a client-side framework that follows the MVC design pattern with two-way data binding, while Handlebars.js is a templating library with simple syntax and client-side rendering capabilities, focusing on creating dynamic HTML templates efficiently.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Backbone.js, Handlebars.js

Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7.5K
Stacks
8.3K
Followers
3.5K
Followers
3.2K
Votes
675
Votes
308
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Javascript structure
  • 101
    Models
  • 98
    Simple
  • 76
    Restful
  • 59
    Easy api
Cons
  • 1
    Requires underscore.js
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Integrations
No integrations available
Mustache
Mustache

What are some alternatives to Backbone.js, Handlebars.js?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase