StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. Beanstalkd vs PHP-FPM

Beanstalkd vs PHP-FPM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Beanstalkd
Beanstalkd
Stacks111
Followers161
Votes74
PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Stacks121
Followers119
Votes0

Beanstalkd vs PHP-FPM: What are the differences?

Introduction

Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM are both popular technologies used in web development. While they serve different purposes, it is important to understand their key differences in order to choose the appropriate tool for a given project.

  1. Concurrency Model: One key difference between Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM lies in their concurrency models. Beanstalkd utilizes a queue-based model, where jobs are pushed into a queue and processed by multiple workers concurrently. On the other hand, PHP-FPM follows a process-based model, where each request is handled by a separate worker process. This fundamental difference in concurrency models can impact the scalability and performance characteristics of each technology.

  2. Use Case: Another significant difference between Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM is their primary use case. Beanstalkd is specifically designed as a job queue system, where tasks can be dispatched asynchronously for processing. It is commonly used for background processing, task scheduling, and distributed job processing. On the other hand, PHP-FPM is a PHP FastCGI Process Manager, which is primarily used as a PHP execution engine to process HTTP requests. It provides a pool of worker processes to handle incoming requests efficiently.

  3. Protocol: Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM also differ in the protocols they use for communication. Beanstalkd uses a simple text-based protocol, where clients interact with the server by sending and receiving textual commands over TCP. This makes it easy to integrate with various programming languages and libraries. In contrast, PHP-FPM uses the FastCGI protocol, which is a binary protocol for communicating between web servers and PHP processes. This protocol allows efficient and secure communication between the web server and PHP-FPM.

  4. Language Compatibility: Beanstalkd is language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any programming language that supports TCP sockets and can send/receive text-based commands. This flexibility allows developers to use their preferred programming language for interacting with the job queue system. On the other hand, PHP-FPM is specifically designed for PHP applications, making it a natural choice for PHP-based web projects. It provides tight integration with PHP and offers features and optimizations specific to the PHP language.

  5. Scalability: The scalability characteristics of Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM differ due to their underlying architecture. Beanstalkd's queue-based model allows for horizontal scalability by adding more worker processes to process jobs concurrently. This makes it well-suited for handling high volumes of asynchronous tasks. On the other hand, PHP-FPM's process-based model allows for vertical scalability by increasing system resources allocated to each worker process. This makes it suitable for handling a higher load of concurrent PHP requests.

  6. Monitoring and Management: Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM differ in terms of the tools and mechanisms available for monitoring and managing their respective services. Beanstalkd provides a web-based administration console called Beanstalkd Console, which allows monitoring and management of queues, jobs, and workers. It also provides a command-line interface (CLI) for interacting with the server programmatically. In contrast, PHP-FPM does not have a built-in monitoring or management console. However, it can be monitored and managed using tools like PHP-FPM Status Page and various server monitoring tools.

In summary, Beanstalkd and PHP-FPM differ in their concurrency models, use cases, protocols, language compatibility, scalability characteristics, and monitoring/management options. Understanding these differences is crucial in choosing the appropriate technology for specific development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalkd
Beanstalkd
PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

Statistics
Stacks
111
Stacks
121
Followers
161
Followers
119
Votes
74
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Fast
  • 12
    Does one thing well
  • 12
    Free
  • 9
    Scalability
  • 8
    Simplicity
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Beanstalkd, PHP-FPM?

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

delayed_job

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Cron

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

Que

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Goose

Goose

It is a simple, reliable & scalable background processing library for Clojure. It has a transparent design & cloud-native architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase