Bookshelf.js vs GORM

Overview

Bookshelf.js

Stacks6

Followers21

Votes3

GORM

Stacks193

Followers128

Votes0

GitHub Stars657

Forks194

Bookshelf.js vs GORM: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Bookshelf.js and GORM, focusing on their unique features and capabilities.

1. **Language Compatibility**: Bookshelf.js is specifically designed for Node.js applications, while GORM is tailored for Groovy-based applications that use the Grails framework. This difference in language compatibility impacts the integration and compatibility of these ORMs with the overall technology stack of the application.

2. **ORM Design Philosophy**: Bookshelf.js follows the Data Mapper pattern, emphasizing separation of concerns by isolating the business logic from the database logic. On the other hand, GORM adopts the Active Record pattern, where the model classes encapsulate both the data and behavior, providing a more straightforward and integrated approach to database operations.

3. **Database Support**: Bookshelf.js has built-in support for multiple databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, offering flexibility in choosing the database that best fits the application requirements. In contrast, GORM is primarily focused on supporting the Groovy-based GORM-oriented databases, potentially limiting the database options available to developers.

4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Bookshelf.js has a vibrant and active community with a rich ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and documentation readily available to developers. GORM, being part of the Grails framework, benefits from the larger Grails community but may have a narrower focus on database-related features compared to the broader ecosystem of Bookshelf.js.

5. **Performance and Scalability**: Bookshelf.js is known for its lightweight and performant nature, making it suitable for small to mid-sized applications that require fast data access and manipulation. In contrast, GORM, being part of the Grails framework, provides a more integrated solution for larger-scale applications with enterprise-level requirements, offering features for scalability and robustness.

6. **Learning Curve and Ease of Use**: Bookshelf.js is praised for its simplicity and ease of use, with a straightforward API that is easy for beginners to pick up and start using. GORM, while powerful and feature-rich, may have a steeper learning curve due to its integration with the Grails framework and the additional concepts it introduces.

In Summary, the key differences between Bookshelf.js and GORM lie in their language compatibility, ORM design philosophy, database support, community and ecosystem, performance and scalability, and learning curve and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bookshelf.js	GORM
It stems from the Knex.js, which is a flexible query builder that works with PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite3. Bookshelf.js builds on top of this by providing functionality for creating data models, forming relations between these models, and other common tasks needed when querying a database.	It is a fantastic ORM library for Golang, aims to be developer friendly. It is an ORM library for dealing with relational databases. This library is developed on top of database/sql package.
Table creation; Manipulation; Promise-based and traditional callback interfaces; Transaction	Full-Featured ORM; Associations (has one, has many, belongs to, many to many, polymorphism, single-table inheritance); Hooks (before/after create/save/update/delete/find); Eager loading with Preload, Joins; Transactions, Nested Transactions, Save Point, RollbackTo to Saved Point; Context, Prepared Statment Mode, DryRun Mode; Batch Insert, FindInBatches, Find/Create with Map, CRUD with SQL Expr and Context Valuer; SQL Builder, Upsert, Locking, Optimizer/Index/Comment Hints, Named Argument, SubQuery; Composite Primary Key, Indexes, Constraints; Auto Migrations; Logger; Extendable, flexible plugin API
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 657
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 194
Stacks 6	Stacks 193
Followers 21	Followers 128
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Uses both promises and callback methods	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript MySQL Node.js Knex.js MongoDB SQLite	MongoDB Jenkins Spring Boot Groovy

What are some alternatives to Bookshelf.js, GORM?

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Hibernate

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

MikroORM

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

Entity Framework

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Entity Framework Core

It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Related Comparisons

Bookshelf.js vs GORM: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Bookshelf.js and GORM, focusing on their unique features and capabilities.

1. **Language Compatibility**: Bookshelf.js is specifically designed for Node.js applications, while GORM is tailored for Groovy-based applications that use the Grails framework. This difference in language compatibility impacts the integration and compatibility of these ORMs with the overall technology stack of the application.

2. **ORM Design Philosophy**: Bookshelf.js follows the Data Mapper pattern, emphasizing separation of concerns by isolating the business logic from the database logic. On the other hand, GORM adopts the Active Record pattern, where the model classes encapsulate both the data and behavior, providing a more straightforward and integrated approach to database operations.

3. **Database Support**: Bookshelf.js has built-in support for multiple databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite, offering flexibility in choosing the database that best fits the application requirements. In contrast, GORM is primarily focused on supporting the Groovy-based GORM-oriented databases, potentially limiting the database options available to developers.

4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Bookshelf.js has a vibrant and active community with a rich ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and documentation readily available to developers. GORM, being part of the Grails framework, benefits from the larger Grails community but may have a narrower focus on database-related features compared to the broader ecosystem of Bookshelf.js.

5. **Performance and Scalability**: Bookshelf.js is known for its lightweight and performant nature, making it suitable for small to mid-sized applications that require fast data access and manipulation. In contrast, GORM, being part of the Grails framework, provides a more integrated solution for larger-scale applications with enterprise-level requirements, offering features for scalability and robustness.

6. **Learning Curve and Ease of Use**: Bookshelf.js is praised for its simplicity and ease of use, with a straightforward API that is easy for beginners to pick up and start using. GORM, while powerful and feature-rich, may have a steeper learning curve due to its integration with the Grails framework and the additional concepts it introduces.

Bookshelf.js vs GORM

Overview