StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Bottle vs Leaf PHP

Bottle vs Leaf PHP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bottle
Bottle
Stacks74
Followers55
Votes5
Leaf PHP
Leaf PHP
Stacks4
Followers22
Votes20
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks70

Bottle vs Leaf PHP: What are the differences?

  1. Routing: One key difference between Bottle and Leaf PHP is that Bottle uses a simple routing system, where routes are defined using decorators, while Leaf PHP uses a more traditional routing system with URL patterns and controllers.

  2. Templating: Another difference is that Bottle allows templates to be directly embedded in the route handlers using string literals, while in Leaf PHP, templates are stored in separate files and rendered using a template engine.

  3. Middleware: Bottle has a limited middleware support, allowing for adding middleware functions to run before or after a route handler, whereas Leaf PHP has a more robust middleware system that allows multiple middleware functions to be added and executed in a specific order.

  4. Database Integration: Bottle provides minimal support for database integration, with the option to use external libraries for database access, while Leaf PHP comes with built-in support for database operations using PDO (PHP Data Objects) for database connectivity.

  5. Error Handling: When it comes to error handling, Bottle provides basic error handling functionalities, while Leaf PHP offers more advanced error handling features such as error logging, custom error pages, and error reporting settings.

  6. Community and Documentation: Lastly, Bottle has a smaller community and less comprehensive documentation compared to Leaf PHP, which has a larger user base and extensive documentation to support developers in using the framework effectively.

In Summary, the key differences between Bottle and Leaf PHP lie in their routing systems, templating approaches, middleware support, database integration, error handling capabilities, and community/documentation resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bottle, Leaf PHP

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bottle
Bottle
Leaf PHP
Leaf PHP

It is distributed as a single file module and has no dependencies other than the Python Standard Library. It has fast and pythonic built-in template engine and support for mako, jinja2 and cheetah templates.

It is a PHP micro-framework which helps you create web applications and APIs from the ground up in minutes. It gives you a particular structure to follow whiles maintaining PHP's freedom.

Fast and pythonic built-in template engine; Built-in HTTP development server
Quickly Create PHP Projects; Structured PHP; Simple PHP methods; Clean, Fast, Reliable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
70
Stacks
74
Stacks
4
Followers
55
Followers
22
Votes
5
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Super easy to use
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 1
    Faster
Pros
  • 1
    Extremely Fast
  • 1
    Microframework
  • 1
    Built-in Auth
  • 1
    Great For API
  • 1
    Modular
Integrations
Python
Python
Vue.js
Vue.js
Jinja
Jinja
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bottle, Leaf PHP?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase