StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Bottle vs Web2py

Bottle vs Web2py

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Web2py
Web2py
Stacks35
Followers43
Votes9
Bottle
Bottle
Stacks74
Followers55
Votes5

Bottle vs Web2py: What are the differences?

### Introduction
In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Bottle and Web2py, two popular Python web frameworks.

1. **Architecture**: Bottle is a minimalist web framework with a single file module, making it light and easy to deploy, whereas Web2py is a full-stack framework with more built-in functionality and features, suitable for large-scale applications.
2. **Database Support**: Bottle has limited support for databases and requires additional libraries for ORM functionality, while Web2py comes with built-in support for multiple databases and includes a powerful ORM system.
3. **Documentation**: Bottle has concise and straightforward documentation, with a focus on simplicity and efficiency, whereas Web2py offers extensive documentation covering a wide range of topics, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot.
4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Bottle has a smaller community and less third-party plugin support compared to Web2py, which has a larger user base and extensive ecosystem with a wide variety of plugins and extensions available.
5. **Development Speed**: Bottle is known for its simplicity and fast development cycle, making it ideal for prototyping and small projects, while Web2py, due to its full-stack nature and included features, may require more time for setting up and configuring, but can be more efficient in the long run for larger projects.
6. **Flexibility and Extensibility**: Bottle provides basic functionality out-of-the-box and allows for easy customization, but lacks some advanced features, whereas Web2py offers a more comprehensive set of tools and modules, allowing for greater flexibility and extensibility in complex projects.

In Summary, the key differences between Bottle and Web2py lie in their architecture, database support, documentation, community, development speed, and flexibility. Each framework caters to different needs and preferences, offering unique advantages for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Web2py, Bottle

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Web2py
Web2py
Bottle
Bottle

It is a free open source full-stack framework for rapid development of fast, scalable, secure and portable database-driven web-based applications. Written and programmable in Python

It is distributed as a single file module and has no dependencies other than the Python Standard Library. It has fast and pythonic built-in template engine and support for mako, jinja2 and cheetah templates.

Web-Based IDE; Extensive Docs
Fast and pythonic built-in template engine; Built-in HTTP development server
Statistics
Stacks
35
Stacks
74
Followers
43
Followers
55
Votes
9
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Python
  • 2
    Template language is Python
  • 2
    Easy
  • 1
    Inspired by Django
Cons
  • 1
    Less popular than Django
Pros
  • 2
    Super easy to use
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 1
    Faster
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
JSON
JSON
Python
Python
Vue.js
Vue.js
Jinja
Jinja

What are some alternatives to Web2py, Bottle?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase