Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Browserify

1.8K
414
+ 1
261
Closure Compiler

203
62
+ 1
5
Add tool

Browserify vs Closure Compiler: What are the differences?

### Introduction
When it comes to bundling and optimizing JavaScript code for web development, Browserify and Closure Compiler are two popular tools that serve different purposes. 

1. **Compilation Process:** Browserify focuses on bundling JavaScript files together by resolving dependencies and creating a single file for the browser to use. On the other hand, Closure Compiler aims at code optimization by performing advanced static analysis, dead code elimination, and minification to produce highly efficient and compact code for deployment.

2. **Module Handling:** Browserify follows the CommonJS module system, making it easy to work with Node.js-style modules and npm packages in the browser. In contrast, Closure Compiler supports both CommonJS and ES6 module syntax, providing more flexibility in handling different module formats during compilation.

3. **Code Size Reduction:** Closure Compiler reduces code size significantly through advanced optimization techniques like tree shaking and variable renaming, which Browserify does not offer out-of-the-box. This results in faster loading times and better performance for applications optimized with Closure Compiler.

4. **Error Reporting:** Browserify provides detailed error messages and stack traces during bundling, making it easier for developers to debug issues related to module resolution and dependencies. Closure Compiler offers detailed warnings and error checking to improve code quality but may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with its advanced optimization features.

5. **Community Ecosystem:** Browserify has a large community of developers and plugins available on npm to extend its functionality and customize the bundling process further. On the other hand, Closure Compiler has a more specialized community focused on advanced JavaScript optimizations, which may limit the availability of resources and support for beginners.

6. **Usage Complexity:** Browserify is relatively easy to set up and use, requiring minimal configuration to bundle JavaScript files, while Closure Compiler may require more configuration and understanding of its optimization flags to achieve the desired level of code optimization and performance improvements.

### Summary
In summary, Browserify focuses on bundling JavaScript files with ease and simplicity, while Closure Compiler excels in code optimization and size reduction through advanced static analysis techniques. Each tool serves a different purpose in the JavaScript development ecosystem, catering to different needs based on the level of optimization and module handling required for a project.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Browserify
Pros of Closure Compiler
  • 75
    Node style browser code
  • 52
    Load modules installed by npm
  • 45
    Works great with gulp.js
  • 38
    NPM modules in the brower
  • 34
    Open source
  • 16
    Node streams
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    The best performing output
  • 1
    Small output size
  • 1
    Dead code elimination
  • 1
    ES6 support
  • 1
    Bundle support for CommonJS, ES6, .
  • 0
    Ease

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Browserify?

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

What is Closure Compiler?

The Closure Compiler is a tool for making JavaScript download and run faster. It is a true compiler for JavaScript. Instead of compiling from a source language to machine code, it compiles from JavaScript to better JavaScript. It parses your JavaScript, analyzes it, removes dead code and rewrites and minimizes what's left. It also checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Browserify?
What companies use Closure Compiler?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Browserify?
What tools integrate with Closure Compiler?

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Browserify and Closure Compiler?
Bower
Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.
Webpack
A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
Babel
Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.
rollup
It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.
RequireJS
RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.
See all alternatives