Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Browserify vs Parcel: What are the differences?
- Configuration: Browserify requires explicit configuration settings and plugins for advanced features, whereas Parcel offers a zero-configuration setup by automatically resolving dependencies and applying necessary transformations.
- Bundle Size Optimization: Browserify tends to produce larger bundle sizes compared to Parcel due to its traditional bundling approach, while Parcel optimizes bundle size by tree shaking, code splitting, and other optimization techniques.
- Performance: Parcel is known for faster build times because of its automatic parallelization and caching mechanisms, while Browserify can be slower during the bundling process, especially for larger projects.
- Plugin Ecosystem: Browserify has a larger and more mature plugin ecosystem that allows developers to customize and extend its functionality, while Parcel's plugin ecosystem is still growing but offers a streamlined development experience.
- Hot Module Replacement (HMR): Parcel has built-in support for HMR, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without a full page reload, while Browserify requires additional configuration and setup to enable HMR functionality.
- Community Support: Browserify has been around longer and has a larger community, making it easier to find solutions to common issues and share knowledge, whereas Parcel, being newer, is quickly gaining popularity and community support.
In Summary, Browserify and Parcel differ in configuration requirements, bundle size optimization, performance, plugin ecosystem, HMR support, and community presence.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of Browserify
Pros of Parcel
Pros of Browserify
- Node style browser code75
- Load modules installed by npm52
- Works great with gulp.js45
- NPM modules in the brower38
- Open source34
- Node streams16
- Easy setup1
Pros of Parcel
- Zero configuration10
- Built-in dev server with livereload8
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Browserify
Cons of Parcel
Cons of Browserify
Be the first to leave a con
Cons of Parcel
- Lack of documentation3
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Browserify?
Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.
What is Parcel?
Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Browserify and Parcel as a desired skillset
What companies use Browserify?
What companies use Parcel?
What companies use Browserify?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Browserify?
What tools integrate with Parcel?
What tools integrate with Parcel?
Blog Posts
+46 27
32735
+33 20
2146
What are some alternatives to Browserify and Parcel?
Bower
Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.
Webpack
A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
Babel
Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.
rollup
It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.
RequireJS
RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.