Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bull
Bull

13
11
+ 1
2
Fireworq
Fireworq

0
4
+ 1
0
Add tool

Bull vs Fireworq: What are the differences?

What is Bull? Premium Queue package for handling jobs and messages in NodeJS. The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

.

What is Fireworq? A lightweight, high-performance, language-independent job queue system. Fireworq is a lightweight, high-performance job queue system available from any programming language which can talk HTTP. It works with a single binary without external dependencies.

Bull and Fireworq can be categorized as "Background Processing" tools.

Some of the features offered by Bull are:

  • Minimal CPU usage due to a polling-free design.
  • Robust design based on Redis.
  • Delayed jobs.

On the other hand, Fireworq provides the following key features:

  • Portability
  • Reliability
  • Availability

Bull and Fireworq are both open source tools. Bull with 5.95K GitHub stars and 584 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Fireworq with 1.77K GitHub stars and 77 GitHub forks.

What is Bull?

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

What is Fireworq?

Fireworq is a lightweight, high-performance job queue system available from any programming language which can talk HTTP. It works with a single binary without external dependencies.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Bull?
Why do developers choose Fireworq?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Bull?
        What companies use Fireworq?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Bull?
          What tools integrate with Fireworq?
          What are some alternatives to Bull and Fireworq?
          Sidekiq
          Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.
          Resque
          Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.
          Beanstalkd
          Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.
          delayed_job
          Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.
          PHP-FPM
          It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about Bull and Fireworq
          No stack decisions found
          Interest over time
          Reviews of Bull and Fireworq
          No reviews found
          How developers use Bull and Fireworq
          No items found
          How much does Bull cost?
          How much does Fireworq cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          Pricing unavailable
          News about Bull
          More news
          News about Fireworq
          More news