Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bull

74
113
+ 1
4
Hangfire

167
244
+ 1
17
Add tool

Bull vs Hangfire: What are the differences?

Developers describe Bull as "Premium Queue package for handling jobs and messages in NodeJS". The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

. On the other hand, Hangfire is detailed as "Perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications". It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Bull and Hangfire belong to "Background Processing" category of the tech stack.

Bull and Hangfire are both open source tools. Bull with 6.16K GitHub stars and 619 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Hangfire with 4.93K GitHub stars and 1.12K GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Hangfire has a broader approval, being mentioned in 9 company stacks & 9 developers stacks; compared to Bull, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Bull
Pros of Hangfire
  • 2
    Automatic recovery from process crashes
  • 1
    Ease of use
  • 1
    Based on Redis
  • 7
    Integrated UI dashboard
  • 5
    Simple
  • 3
    Robust
  • 2
    In Memory
  • 0
    Simole

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Bull?

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

What is Hangfire?

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Bull?
What companies use Hangfire?
See which teams inside your own company are using Bull or Hangfire.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Bull?
What tools integrate with Hangfire?

Blog Posts

JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+29
14
13418
What are some alternatives to Bull and Hangfire?
Buffalo
Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together.
Sidekiq
Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.
Resque
Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.
Beanstalkd
Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.
PHP-FPM
It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.
See all alternatives