Cactus vs Hugo: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**

**1. Performance:** Hugo is known for its incredibly fast build times, making it a suitable choice for large websites or blogs with complex structures. On the other hand, Cactus may take longer to generate a website due to its slower build times.

**2. Themes and Templates:** Hugo offers a wide range of themes and templates that can be easily customized to fit your website's needs. Cactus, on the other hand, may have fewer options and may require more manual customization.

**3. Content Organization:** Hugo uses a content organization system inspired by static site generators, resulting in a more structured and organized way to manage content. Cactus may not have as advanced a content organization system, making Hugo a better choice for projects with a lot of content.

**4. Active Development:** Hugo has a large and active community of developers, resulting in frequent updates and improvements to the platform. Cactus, on the other hand, may not receive updates as regularly, potentially leading to compatibility issues or security vulnerabilities.

**5. Ease of Use:** Hugo is often praised for its user-friendly design and intuitive commands, making it easier for users to get started with the platform. Cactus, while relatively straightforward, may require a steeper learning curve for beginners.

**6. Extensibility:** Hugo offers a robust system for extending its functionality through various plugins and integrations, allowing users to add features or optimize their websites as needed. Cactus may have limitations in terms of extensibility, making Hugo a more flexible option for developers looking to expand their websites' capabilities.

In Summary, Hugo and Cactus have key differences in performance, themes, content organization, development activity, ease of use, and extensibility that should be considered when choosing a static site generator for your project.