StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Caddy vs Zope

Caddy vs Zope

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Caddy
Caddy
Stacks363
Followers282
Votes20
GitHub Stars67.7K
Forks4.5K
Zope
Zope
Stacks175
Followers14
Votes1
GitHub Stars377
Forks106

Caddy vs Zope: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Scalability: Caddy is well-suited for small to medium-sized websites or applications, while Zope is more geared towards larger and complex web projects with its robust scalability features.

  2. Language Support: Caddy primarily uses Go language for its configuration, while Zope is written in Python, offering developers different language environments to work with.

  3. Community Support: Caddy has a growing community but may not have as extensive support and plugins as Zope, which has a well-established community backing it with a wide range of available resources for developers.

  4. Configuration Complexity: Caddy provides a simpler configuration setup with automatic HTTPS and other advanced features, whereas Zope may require more manual configuration and setup due to its flexibility and extensive customization options.

  5. Performance Optimization: Caddy focuses on performance optimization out of the box, making it easier to deploy and maintain, while Zope may require more fine-tuning and optimization to achieve the desired performance levels.

  6. Ease of Use: Caddy emphasizes simplicity and ease of use with its user-friendly interface and streamlined setup process, while Zope offers more intricate and powerful tools that may require a learning curve for new users.

In Summary, Caddy and Zope differ in scalability, language support, community backing, configuration complexity, performance optimization, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Caddy
Caddy
Zope
Zope

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

It is a family of free and open-source web application servers written in Python, and their associated online community. It stands for "Z Object Publishing Environment", and was the first system using the now common object publishing methodology for the Web

Static file server; Reverse proxy; Load balancing; Automatic HTTPS; TLS by default; Caddyfile; Config API; Config adapters; HTTP/1.1; HTTP/2; HTTP/3; Virtual hosting; TLS ceritificate auto-renew; Extensible; No dependencies; Fewer moving parts
Easy to use; Specific; Reusable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
67.7K
GitHub Stars
377
GitHub Forks
4.5K
GitHub Forks
106
Stacks
363
Stacks
175
Followers
282
Followers
14
Votes
20
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easy HTTP/2 Server Push
  • 6
    Sane config file syntax
  • 4
    Builtin HTTPS
  • 2
    Letsencrypt support
  • 2
    Runtime config API
Cons
  • 3
    New kid
Pros
  • 1
    For using Plone CMS
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
EasyEngine
EasyEngine
Plesk
Plesk
Scalyr
Scalyr
Datadog
Datadog
Tarantool
Tarantool
OpenResty
OpenResty

What are some alternatives to Caddy, Zope?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase