StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Calabash vs Cucumber

Calabash vs Cucumber

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
Calabash
Calabash
Stacks8
Followers9
Votes0

Calabash vs Cucumber: What are the differences?

Introduction: Calabash and Cucumber are both popular testing frameworks used for automated testing of mobile applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that developers and testers should be aware of.

  1. Language Support: One significant difference between Calabash and Cucumber is the language used for writing test scripts. Calabash uses Ruby as the scripting language, whereas Cucumber supports multiple languages like Ruby, Java, and JavaScript. This difference in language support can impact the choice of framework based on the expertise of the testing team.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Another important distinction is platform compatibility. Calabash is specifically designed for testing mobile applications on iOS and Android platforms, while Cucumber is not limited to mobile app testing and can be used for web applications, APIs, and other software systems. The choice between the two frameworks depends on the target platform and the scope of testing.

  3. Implementation Approach: Calabash follows a behavior-driven development (BDD) approach, where test scenarios are written in a natural language style using the Gherkin syntax. On the other hand, Cucumber is a testing tool that supports BDD, but it can also be used for other testing purposes such as acceptance testing and regression testing. The difference in implementation approach can influence the testing strategy and team collaboration.

  4. Community Support: When considering community support, Cucumber has a larger and more diverse community compared to Calabash. This means that developers and testers using Cucumber have access to a wider range of resources, plugins, and documentation, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and expand test coverage. The level of community support can play a crucial role in the adoption and success of a testing framework.

  5. Integration with Testing Tools: Calabash offers seamless integration with popular testing tools like Appium and Selenium, which enhances the capabilities of the framework for mobile app testing. On the other hand, Cucumber can be integrated with a wide range of testing tools and frameworks, providing flexibility and scalability in the testing process. The choice of framework may depend on the existing testing toolchain and infrastructure in place.

In Summary, Calabash and Cucumber differ in language support, platform compatibility, implementation approach, community support, and integration with testing tools, making them suitable for different testing requirements and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
Calabash
Calabash

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Calabash-iOS and Calabash-Android are the underlying low-level libraries that empower the Cucumber tool to run automated functional tests on Android and iOS phones and tablets as well as on simulators. These low-level libraries enable QA, business staff and developers to work at a high level by writing tests in a natural language using the terms and concepts of their business domain.

Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
8
Followers
927
Followers
9
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, Calabash?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot