StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. CanJS vs Ember.js

CanJS vs Ember.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ember.js
Ember.js
Stacks1.6K
Followers865
Votes775
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks4.2K
CanJS
CanJS
Stacks10
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks419

Ember.js vs CanJS: What are the differences?

Ember.js: A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps. A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI; CanJS: Build CRUD apps in fewer lines of code. CanJS is an evolving and improving set of client-side JavaScript architectural libraries that balances innovation and stability. It targets experienced developers building complex applications with long futures ahead of them.

Ember.js and CanJS can be categorized as "Javascript MVC Frameworks" tools.

Ember.js and CanJS are both open source tools. Ember.js with 21.1K GitHub stars and 4.17K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than CanJS with 1.76K GitHub stars and 411 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js
Ember.js
CanJS
CanJS

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

CanJS is an evolving and improving set of client-side JavaScript architectural libraries that balances innovation and stability. It targets experienced developers building complex applications with long futures ahead of them.

Creating web apps;Building UI
Community Driven Development; Tree-shakeable JavaScript Module Builds; Simple model mixins
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
419
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
10
Followers
865
Followers
11
Votes
775
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    Elegant
  • 97
    Quick to develop
  • 83
    Great mvc
  • 82
    Great community
  • 73
    Great router
Cons
  • 2
    Very little flexibility
  • 2
    Too much convention, too little configuration
  • 1
    Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful
  • 1
    Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Node.js
Node.js
Discourse
Discourse
AngularJS
AngularJS
Slack
Slack
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, CanJS?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

Chaplin

Chaplin

Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase