StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Cassandra vs Kafka

Cassandra vs Kafka

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cassandra
Cassandra
Stacks3.6K
Followers3.5K
Votes507
GitHub Stars9.5K
Forks3.8K
Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K

Cassandra vs Kafka: What are the differences?

Cassandra and Kafka are two popular open-source distributed systems used for different purposes. While Cassandra is a highly scalable and distributed NoSQL database, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Data Storage and Processing: Cassandra is primarily designed for data storage and processing, providing a highly scalable and fault-tolerant solution for storing data across multiple nodes. On the other hand, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that enables high-throughput, fault-tolerant distributed messaging and real-time data streaming.

  2. Message vs Data: Cassandra is designed to store and retrieve large amounts of structured and unstructured data, making it suitable for use cases such as online transaction processing, time-series data, and analytics. In contrast, Kafka is optimized for handling streams of messages or events, making it ideal for scenarios like real-time analytics, event sourcing, log aggregation, and data integration.

  3. Data Model: Another significant difference is their data model. Cassandra uses a flexible schema-less data model, allowing users to store and query data without predefined structure or fixed schema. It supports both key-value and tabular data models. On the other hand, Kafka doesn't have a data model of its own. It acts as a message queue that can transmit data in any format or structure, such as JSON, Avro, or raw bytes.

  4. Data Consistency: Cassandra provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that data written to the database is immediately consistent across all replicas. It achieves this by using the Quorum consistency level for read and write operations. In contrast, Kafka sacrifices strong consistency for high throughput and fault tolerance. It guarantees at-least-once message processing, providing eventual consistency across consumers.

  5. Data Replication: Cassandra uses a peer-to-peer distributed architecture with data replication across multiple nodes, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. It uses a configurable replication factor to determine the number of copies of data stored across the cluster. Kafka, on the other hand, uses a distributed log-based architecture with replication for fault tolerance. It replicates data, called partitions, across multiple brokers to provide durability and availability.

  6. Query Language: Cassandra uses CQL (Cassandra Query Language), which is similar to SQL, for querying data. It supports a wide range of query operations, including filtering, aggregation, and joins. Kafka, being a distributed messaging system, doesn't have a query language of its own. However, it provides a simple publish-subscribe API and supports Kafka Streams, which allows for real-time data processing using a stream processing DSL.

In summary, Cassandra is a NoSQL database used for scalable and fault-tolerant data storage and processing, while Kafka is a distributed streaming platform used for high-throughput, fault-tolerant messaging and real-time data streaming.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Cassandra, Kafka

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.8k views10.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cassandra
Cassandra
Kafka
Kafka

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

-
Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.5K
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Forks
3.8K
GitHub Forks
14.8K
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
24.2K
Followers
3.5K
Followers
22.3K
Votes
507
Votes
607
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 98
    High performance
  • 81
    High availability
  • 74
    Easy scalability
  • 53
    Replication
Cons
  • 3
    Reliability of replication
  • 1
    Size
  • 1
    Updates
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging

What are some alternatives to Cassandra, Kafka?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase