StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. UI Components
  5. Chakra UI vs Material Components Web

Chakra UI vs Material Components Web

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Components Web
Material Components Web
Stacks12
Followers23
Votes0
GitHub Stars17.1K
Forks2.1K
Chakra UI
Chakra UI
Stacks217
Followers297
Votes18
GitHub Stars39.9K
Forks3.5K

Chakra UI vs Material Components Web: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Chakra UI and Material Components Web are two popular UI component libraries often used in web development. Below are the key differences between the two:

1. **Design Philosophy**: Chakra UI focuses on providing a library of accessible and customizable components that follow a consistent design system, making it ideal for rapid prototyping and development. On the other hand, Material Components Web follows the Material Design guidelines set by Google, incorporating design principles like material realism and motion for a visually consistent UI experience.

2. **Usage of CSS**: Chakra UI utilizes styled-components for styling components, allowing for the use of styled props for dynamic styling. In contrast, Material Components Web uses CSS classes with specific naming conventions based on BEM methodology for styling components, providing a more traditional approach to styling.

3. **Theming Customization**: Chakra UI offers a theming system that allows developers to easily customize the default theme or create their custom themes using tokens like colors, fonts, and spacing. Material Components Web also supports theming customization but follows the Material Design theming guidelines, making it easier to adhere to the predefined design principles.

4. **Component Variants**: Chakra UI provides a wide range of variants for each component, such as sizes, colors, and styles, offering greater flexibility in component customization. Meanwhile, Material Components Web focuses on consistency and adherence to the Material Design guidelines, limiting the number of variants available for each component.

5. **JavaScript Framework Compatibility**: Chakra UI is designed to work seamlessly with React, making it a popular choice among React developers. Material Components Web, on the other hand, provides support for various JavaScript frameworks like Angular, Vue, and React, making it a versatile option for developers working with different frameworks.

6. **Community Support and Documentation**: Chakra UI has a growing community and extensive documentation that is focused on providing clear examples and best practices for using the library. In comparison, Material Components Web benefits from Google's backing, offering comprehensive documentation and resources, as well as regular updates and improvements to the library.

In Summary, Chakra UI and Material Components Web differ in their design philosophy, CSS usage, theming customization, component variants, JavaScript framework compatibility, and community support and documentation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Components Web
Material Components Web
Chakra UI
Chakra UI

It helps developers execute Material Design. Developed by a core team of engineers and UX designers at Google, these components enable a reliable development workflow to build beautiful and functional web projects.

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

Modular; Customizable; Material Design UI components
Ease of Styling; Flexible & composable; Dark Mode
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.1K
GitHub Stars
39.9K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
3.5K
Stacks
12
Stacks
217
Followers
23
Followers
297
Votes
0
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript Support
  • 4
    Responsiveness
  • 4
    Accessibility
  • 3
    Good documentation
Cons
  • 2
    Hard to customise
  • 1
    Styling system
  • 1
    Inflexible token structure
  • 1
    # of components
Integrations
React
React
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React

What are some alternatives to Material Components Web, Chakra UI?

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

ElementUI

ElementUI

It is not focused on Mobile development, mainly because it lacks responsiveness on mobile WebViews.

Ionicons

Ionicons

Premium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed.

Radix Primitives

Radix Primitives

It is a low-level UI component library with a focus on accessibility, customization and developer experience. You can use these components either as the base layer of your design system, or adopt them incrementally.

DevExtreme

DevExtreme

From Angular and React, to ASP.NET Core or Vue, it includes a comprehensive collection of high-performance and responsive UI widgets for use in traditional web and next-gen mobile applications. The suite ships with a feature-complete data grid, interactive charts widgets, data editors, and much more.

jQWidgets

jQWidgets

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

React Spectrum

React Spectrum

It is a React implementation of Spectrum, Adobe's design system. It provides components that are adaptive to interactions and screen sizes across devices, and includes full screen reader and keyboard navigation support for accessibility.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase