Chakra UI vs Telerik UI

Overview

Chakra UI

Stacks217

Followers297

Votes18

GitHub Stars39.9K

Forks3.5K

Telerik UI

Stacks19

Followers24

Votes0

Chakra UI vs Telerik UI: What are the differences?

Component Library: Chakra UI is a lightweight and modular component library built with accessibility in mind, providing a wide range of customizable components. In contrast, Telerik UI is a comprehensive suite of 70+ UI components, which offers a wide variety of features and functionalities for web development.
Styling Approach: Chakra UI uses a combination of utility-first and styled-system approaches for styling components, allowing for quick and easy customization. On the other hand, Telerik UI utilizes a set of predefined themes and CSS classes for styling, providing a more structured and consistent design experience for developers.
Community Support: Chakra UI has a growing community of developers and contributors, providing active support and frequent updates to the library. In contrast, Telerik UI has a well-established community and dedicated support team, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources for developers.
Installation and Dependency: Chakra UI can be easily installed via npm or yarn, with minimal dependencies and a small bundle size, making it lightweight and efficient. Meanwhile, Telerik UI requires additional setup and configuration, including the installation of specific libraries and tools for integration with various web frameworks.
License Model: Chakra UI is an open-source project licensed under the MIT License, allowing for free usage and modification of the library in commercial projects. Telerik UI follows a commercial license model, offering different pricing plans based on usage and deployment needs, which may require a paid subscription for access to certain features.
Customization Capabilities: Chakra UI provides extensive support for custom theming and styling, allowing developers to create unique design systems and user interfaces. In contrast, Telerik UI has a more rigid design structure with limited customization options, making it less flexible for highly tailored UI designs.

In Summary, Chakra UI and Telerik UI differ in their component library focus, styling approach, community support, installation process, license model, and customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Chakra UI	Telerik UI
It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.	It includes more than 100 versatile and performance-optimized components that help you build high-quality, professional line-of-business projects. From the leading AJAX data grid to the full-featured HTML editor used by Microsoft on sites like MSDN, It provides you with all the building blocks to maximize productivity and build richer, slicker and better-performing applications with ease.
Ease of Styling; Flexible & composable; Dark Mode	Complete Set of Features and Controls; Seamless UX Across Devices and Browsers; 21 Built-In Professional Grade Skins
Statistics
GitHub Stars 39.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 217	Stacks 19
Followers 297	Followers 24
Votes 18	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Typescript Support 4 Responsiveness 4 Accessibility 3 Good documentation Cons 2 Hard to customise 1 Styling system 1 Inflexible token structure 1 # of components	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React	ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to Chakra UI, Telerik UI?

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

ElementUI

It is not focused on Mobile development, mainly because it lacks responsiveness on mobile WebViews.

Ionicons

Premium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed.

Radix Primitives

It is a low-level UI component library with a focus on accessibility, customization and developer experience. You can use these components either as the base layer of your design system, or adopt them incrementally.

DevExtreme

From Angular and React, to ASP.NET Core or Vue, it includes a comprehensive collection of high-performance and responsive UI widgets for use in traditional web and next-gen mobile applications. The suite ships with a feature-complete data grid, interactive charts widgets, data editors, and much more.

jQWidgets

It is a software framework with widgets, themes, input validation, drag & drop plug-in, data adapters, built-in WAI-ARIA accessibility, internationalization and MVVM support. It is built on the open standards and technologies HTML5, CSS, JavaScript and jQuery.

React Spectrum

It is a React implementation of Spectrum, Adobe's design system. It provides components that are adaptive to interactions and screen sizes across devices, and includes full screen reader and keyboard navigation support for accessibility.

Related Comparisons

Chakra UI vs Telerik UI: What are the differences?

Component Library: Chakra UI is a lightweight and modular component library built with accessibility in mind, providing a wide range of customizable components. In contrast, Telerik UI is a comprehensive suite of 70+ UI components, which offers a wide variety of features and functionalities for web development.
Styling Approach: Chakra UI uses a combination of utility-first and styled-system approaches for styling components, allowing for quick and easy customization. On the other hand, Telerik UI utilizes a set of predefined themes and CSS classes for styling, providing a more structured and consistent design experience for developers.
Community Support: Chakra UI has a growing community of developers and contributors, providing active support and frequent updates to the library. In contrast, Telerik UI has a well-established community and dedicated support team, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources for developers.
Installation and Dependency: Chakra UI can be easily installed via npm or yarn, with minimal dependencies and a small bundle size, making it lightweight and efficient. Meanwhile, Telerik UI requires additional setup and configuration, including the installation of specific libraries and tools for integration with various web frameworks.
License Model: Chakra UI is an open-source project licensed under the MIT License, allowing for free usage and modification of the library in commercial projects. Telerik UI follows a commercial license model, offering different pricing plans based on usage and deployment needs, which may require a paid subscription for access to certain features.
Customization Capabilities: Chakra UI provides extensive support for custom theming and styling, allowing developers to create unique design systems and user interfaces. In contrast, Telerik UI has a more rigid design structure with limited customization options, making it less flexible for highly tailored UI designs.

In Summary, Chakra UI and Telerik UI differ in their component library focus, styling approach, community support, installation process, license model, and customization capabilities.

Chakra UI vs Telerik UI

Overview