StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Chronix vs Microsoft SQL Server

Chronix vs Microsoft SQL Server

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Stacks21.3K
Followers15.5K
Votes540
Chronix
Chronix
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars266
Forks27

Chronix vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?

  1. Storage Model: Chronix is a time series database specifically designed for storing and analyzing time series data efficiently, while Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database management system that can handle various types of data. Chronix uses a columnar storage model optimized for time series data, enabling faster query performance for time-based queries. On the other hand, SQL Server uses a row-based storage model, which may not be as efficient for time series data queries.

  2. Query Language: Chronix supports a specialized query language tailored for time series data analysis, incorporating functionalities like time-based aggregation, filtering, and interpolation. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server uses Structured Query Language (SQL) for querying, which may not provide as seamless and intuitive capabilities for time series data analysis. The dedicated query language in Chronix can simplify and optimize queries for time series data.

  3. Scalability: Chronix is built with scalability in mind, allowing for horizontal scaling by distributing data across multiple nodes to handle increasing data volumes. On the other hand, while Microsoft SQL Server can scale vertically by adding more resources to a single server, it may not be as inherently scalable when dealing with massive amounts of time series data that require distributed processing.

  4. Data Model: Chronix utilizes a schema-less data model for flexible and dynamic storage of time series data, enabling users to modify data structures without strict schemas. In comparison, Microsoft SQL Server relies on predefined schemas for structuring data, which may restrict the flexibility and ease of adapting to changing time series data requirements.

  5. Support for Time Series Analysis: Chronix provides built-in functionalities and libraries optimized for time series analysis, such as algorithms for anomaly detection, forecasting, and trend analysis. Microsoft SQL Server, while versatile for general data processing, may not offer as many specialized tools and functionalities specifically tailored for advanced time series analysis tasks.

  6. Optimization for Time Series Data: Chronix is engineered to handle time series data efficiently, with optimizations for storage, indexing, and querying tailored to the unique characteristics of time series datasets. In contrast, while Microsoft SQL Server can store and query time series data, it may not offer the same level of performance and optimization specifically designed for time series data workloads.

In Summary, the key differences between Chronix and Microsoft SQL Server lie in their storage model, query language, scalability, data model, support for time series analysis, and optimization for time series data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft SQL Server, Chronix

Erin
Erin

IT Specialist

Mar 10, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL ServerMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

  1. I need to use either @{MySQL}|tool:1025| or @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| on a @{Linux}|tool:10483| based OS. Which would be better for this application?
  2. I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
668k views668k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Chronix
Chronix

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

Chronix is built to store time series highly compressed and for fast access times. In comparison to related time series databases, Chronix does not only take 5 to 171 times less space, but it also shaves off 83% of the access time, and up to 78% off the runtime on a mix of real world queries.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
266
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
27
Stacks
21.3K
Stacks
3
Followers
15.5K
Followers
12
Votes
540
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Reliable and easy to use
  • 101
    High performance
  • 95
    Great with .net
  • 65
    Works well with .net
  • 56
    Easy to maintain
Cons
  • 4
    Expensive Licensing
  • 2
    Microsoft
  • 1
    Replication can loose the data
  • 1
    Allwayon can loose data in asycronious mode
  • 1
    The maximum number of connections is only 14000 connect
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server, Chronix?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase