Cisco ASA vs Panorama

Overview

Cisco ASA

Stacks22

Followers28

Votes0

Panorama

Stacks7

Followers7

Votes0

Cisco ASA vs Panorama: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cisco ASA and Panorama

Management Capabilities: Cisco ASA is a firewall appliance used for network security, while Panorama is a centralized management platform for multiple firewalls. The ASA provides security features such as VPN, intrusion prevention, and antivirus, whereas Panorama allows for centralized configuration and monitoring of multiple firewalls from a single interface.
Scalability: Cisco ASA is designed for smaller to medium-sized organizations, providing robust security features for their network. On the other hand, Panorama is suitable for larger enterprises that require centralized management of multiple firewalls across their network infrastructure.
Vendor Lock-in: Cisco ASA requires organizations to use Cisco hardware, limiting their options for firewall deployment. In contrast, Panorama is vendor-agnostic and can manage firewalls from various vendors, giving organizations more flexibility in choosing their network security solutions.
Visibility and Reporting: Panorama offers advanced reporting and visibility capabilities, providing detailed insights into network traffic, security events, and policy violations across multiple firewalls. This feature is essential for larger organizations with complex network architectures and security requirements.
Automation and Orchestration: Panorama supports automation and orchestration of firewall policies, making it easier to deploy and manage consistent security across an organization's network. This feature enables organizations to streamline their security operations and ensure compliance with industry regulations.
Integration with Cloud Services: While Cisco ASA is primarily designed for on-premise network security, Panorama offers seamless integration with cloud services and virtualized environments. This capability allows organizations to extend their security policies beyond their physical network to protect cloud-based applications and workloads.

In Summary, Cisco ASA is a standalone firewall appliance, whereas Panorama is a centralized management platform for multiple firewalls with advanced management, scalability, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cisco ASA	Panorama
It is a security device that combines firewall, antivirus, intrusion prevention, and virtual private network (VPN) capabilities. It provides proactive threat defense that stops attacks before they spread through the network.	It offers easy-to-implement and centralized management features to gain insight into network-wide traffic, logs and threats. Reduce complexity by simplifying configuration, deployment, and management of your PaloAlto Networks security products.
Superior multilayered protection; Simplified management and lower costs; Unified security services and task automation; Wide range of sizes and form factors	Policy management; Centralized Visibility; Network security insights; Automated threat response; Network Security Management
Statistics
Stacks 22	Stacks 7
Followers 28	Followers 7
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Cisco ASA, Panorama?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Cisco ASA vs Panorama: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cisco ASA and Panorama

Management Capabilities: Cisco ASA is a firewall appliance used for network security, while Panorama is a centralized management platform for multiple firewalls. The ASA provides security features such as VPN, intrusion prevention, and antivirus, whereas Panorama allows for centralized configuration and monitoring of multiple firewalls from a single interface.
Scalability: Cisco ASA is designed for smaller to medium-sized organizations, providing robust security features for their network. On the other hand, Panorama is suitable for larger enterprises that require centralized management of multiple firewalls across their network infrastructure.
Vendor Lock-in: Cisco ASA requires organizations to use Cisco hardware, limiting their options for firewall deployment. In contrast, Panorama is vendor-agnostic and can manage firewalls from various vendors, giving organizations more flexibility in choosing their network security solutions.
Visibility and Reporting: Panorama offers advanced reporting and visibility capabilities, providing detailed insights into network traffic, security events, and policy violations across multiple firewalls. This feature is essential for larger organizations with complex network architectures and security requirements.
Automation and Orchestration: Panorama supports automation and orchestration of firewall policies, making it easier to deploy and manage consistent security across an organization's network. This feature enables organizations to streamline their security operations and ensure compliance with industry regulations.
Integration with Cloud Services: While Cisco ASA is primarily designed for on-premise network security, Panorama offers seamless integration with cloud services and virtualized environments. This capability allows organizations to extend their security policies beyond their physical network to protect cloud-based applications and workloads.

Cisco ASA vs Panorama

Overview

Cisco ASA vs Panorama: What are the differences?