Cisco ASA vs Pulse Secure

Overview

Cisco ASA

Stacks22

Followers28

Votes0

Pulse Secure

Stacks9

Followers15

Votes0

Cisco ASA vs Pulse Secure: What are the differences?

### Key Differences between Cisco ASA and Pulse Secure:
1. **VPN Capabilities**: Cisco ASA is primarily known for its robust VPN capabilities with features like site-to-site VPN, remote access VPN, and clientless SSL VPN. On the other hand, Pulse Secure focuses more on secure access solutions, offering features like secure remote access and application delivery.
2. **Platform Compatibility**: Cisco ASA is usually deployed as a hardware appliance, although virtual versions are available. In contrast, Pulse Secure offers software-based solutions that can be deployed on a wide range of platforms, including virtual and cloud-based environments.
3. **Central Management**: Cisco ASA requires separate management tools for various functions like VPN, firewall, and intrusion prevention. Pulse Secure, on the other hand, comes with a unified and centralized management interface that simplifies the administration of secure access solutions.
4. **Feature Set**: Cisco ASA offers a wide range of security features beyond VPN, such as firewall, IPS, and advanced threat protection. Pulse Secure, while focusing on secure access, provides extensive capabilities for user authentication, access control, and secure application delivery.
5. **Scalability**: Cisco ASA is well-suited for large enterprises with high traffic volumes and complex network environments due to its scalability and performance. Pulse Secure is more commonly used in mid-sized organizations that prioritize secure remote access and application delivery.
6. **Licensing Model**: Cisco ASA typically utilizes a traditional licensing model based on the hardware and features needed. In contrast, Pulse Secure often follows a user-based licensing model, allowing organizations to scale their secure access solutions based on the number of users.

In Summary, Cisco ASA and Pulse Secure offer distinct advantages in terms of VPN capabilities, platform compatibility, central management, feature set, scalability, and licensing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cisco ASA	Pulse Secure
It is a security device that combines firewall, antivirus, intrusion prevention, and virtual private network (VPN) capabilities. It provides proactive threat defense that stops attacks before they spread through the network.	Deliver easy, protected and available access to the data center and cloud with Pulse Secure products.
Superior multilayered protection; Simplified management and lower costs; Unified security services and task automation; Wide range of sizes and form factors	Zero Trust, Secure Access Checklist; IoT Security Best Practices Guide
Statistics
Stacks 22	Stacks 9
Followers 28	Followers 15
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Cisco ASA, Pulse Secure?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Cisco ASA vs Pulse Secure: What are the differences?

### Key Differences between Cisco ASA and Pulse Secure:
1. **VPN Capabilities**: Cisco ASA is primarily known for its robust VPN capabilities with features like site-to-site VPN, remote access VPN, and clientless SSL VPN. On the other hand, Pulse Secure focuses more on secure access solutions, offering features like secure remote access and application delivery.
2. **Platform Compatibility**: Cisco ASA is usually deployed as a hardware appliance, although virtual versions are available. In contrast, Pulse Secure offers software-based solutions that can be deployed on a wide range of platforms, including virtual and cloud-based environments.
3. **Central Management**: Cisco ASA requires separate management tools for various functions like VPN, firewall, and intrusion prevention. Pulse Secure, on the other hand, comes with a unified and centralized management interface that simplifies the administration of secure access solutions.
4. **Feature Set**: Cisco ASA offers a wide range of security features beyond VPN, such as firewall, IPS, and advanced threat protection. Pulse Secure, while focusing on secure access, provides extensive capabilities for user authentication, access control, and secure application delivery.
5. **Scalability**: Cisco ASA is well-suited for large enterprises with high traffic volumes and complex network environments due to its scalability and performance. Pulse Secure is more commonly used in mid-sized organizations that prioritize secure remote access and application delivery.
6. **Licensing Model**: Cisco ASA typically utilizes a traditional licensing model based on the hardware and features needed. In contrast, Pulse Secure often follows a user-based licensing model, allowing organizations to scale their secure access solutions based on the number of users.

In Summary, Cisco ASA and Pulse Secure offer distinct advantages in terms of VPN capabilities, platform compatibility, central management, feature set, scalability, and licensing model.

Cisco ASA vs Pulse Secure

Overview