Cisco ASA vs Zscaler

Overview

Cisco ASA

Stacks22

Followers28

Votes0

Zscaler

Stacks40

Followers80

Votes0

Cisco ASA vs Zscaler: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Cisco ASA and Zscaler

1. **Architecture**: Cisco ASA typically uses a hardware-based solution for network security while Zscaler is a cloud-based security platform. This means that Cisco ASA requires physical hardware to be deployed on-premise, while Zscaler's cloud-based approach allows for easier scalability and accessibility from anywhere.
   
2. **Scalability and Performance**: Cisco ASA's performance is determined by the hardware appliances used, which can limit its scalability, whereas Zscaler's cloud-based architecture offers unlimited scalability and can handle high volumes of traffic efficiently, making it suitable for organizations of all sizes.

3. **Deployment and Management**: Cisco ASA requires manual configuration and ongoing maintenance of hardware devices, which can be complex and time-consuming. In contrast, Zscaler's cloud-native platform enables easy deployment and centralized management through a simple web interface, reducing the operational overhead.

4. **Security Capabilities**: Cisco ASA offers traditional firewall and VPN functionalities, whereas Zscaler provides advanced security features such as cloud sandboxing, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Zscaler's cloud platform is optimized for secure access to web applications and services, ensuring comprehensive protection against modern threats.

5. **Visibility and Control**: While Cisco ASA provides basic visibility and control over network traffic, Zscaler offers granular visibility into user activities and application usage across the network. Zscaler's cloud-native architecture enables real-time monitoring and enforcement of security policies, enhancing overall visibility and control.

6. **Integration and API Support**: Zscaler offers seamless integration with third-party security tools and cloud services through APIs, enabling organizations to build a holistic security ecosystem. Cisco ASA may have limited integration capabilities and may require additional customization for seamless integration with other security solutions.

In Summary, Cisco ASA and Zscaler differ in their architecture, scalability, deployment, security capabilities, visibility, and integration support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cisco ASA	Zscaler
It is a security device that combines firewall, antivirus, intrusion prevention, and virtual private network (VPN) capabilities. It provides proactive threat defense that stops attacks before they spread through the network.	It is a global cloud-based information security company that provides Internet security, web security, firewalls, sandboxing, SSL inspection, antivirus, vulnerability management and granular control of user activity in cloud computing, mobile and Internet of things environments.
Superior multilayered protection; Simplified management and lower costs; Unified security services and task automation; Wide range of sizes and form factors	Internet security; Web security; Firewalls; Sandboxing; SSL inspection; Antivirus; Vulnerability management
Statistics
Stacks 22	Stacks 40
Followers 28	Followers 80
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Cisco ASA, Zscaler?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Cisco ASA vs Zscaler: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Cisco ASA and Zscaler

1. **Architecture**: Cisco ASA typically uses a hardware-based solution for network security while Zscaler is a cloud-based security platform. This means that Cisco ASA requires physical hardware to be deployed on-premise, while Zscaler's cloud-based approach allows for easier scalability and accessibility from anywhere.
   
2. **Scalability and Performance**: Cisco ASA's performance is determined by the hardware appliances used, which can limit its scalability, whereas Zscaler's cloud-based architecture offers unlimited scalability and can handle high volumes of traffic efficiently, making it suitable for organizations of all sizes.

3. **Deployment and Management**: Cisco ASA requires manual configuration and ongoing maintenance of hardware devices, which can be complex and time-consuming. In contrast, Zscaler's cloud-native platform enables easy deployment and centralized management through a simple web interface, reducing the operational overhead.

4. **Security Capabilities**: Cisco ASA offers traditional firewall and VPN functionalities, whereas Zscaler provides advanced security features such as cloud sandboxing, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Zscaler's cloud platform is optimized for secure access to web applications and services, ensuring comprehensive protection against modern threats.

5. **Visibility and Control**: While Cisco ASA provides basic visibility and control over network traffic, Zscaler offers granular visibility into user activities and application usage across the network. Zscaler's cloud-native architecture enables real-time monitoring and enforcement of security policies, enhancing overall visibility and control.

6. **Integration and API Support**: Zscaler offers seamless integration with third-party security tools and cloud services through APIs, enabling organizations to build a holistic security ecosystem. Cisco ASA may have limited integration capabilities and may require additional customization for seamless integration with other security solutions.

In Summary, Cisco ASA and Zscaler differ in their architecture, scalability, deployment, security capabilities, visibility, and integration support.

Cisco ASA vs Zscaler

Overview