StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. Cisco ISE vs DPDK

Cisco ISE vs DPDK

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DPDK
DPDK
Stacks19
Followers24
Votes0
Cisco ISE
Cisco ISE
Stacks19
Followers26
Votes0

Cisco ISE vs DPDK: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Cisco ISE and DPDK

**1. Scalability**: Cisco ISE is designed for network access control and policy enforcement, making it suitable for managing large-scale network infrastructures. On the other hand, DPDK (Data Plane Development Kit) is an open-source set of libraries and drivers that focuses on optimizing packet processing performance on commodity hardware.

**2. Use Case**: Cisco ISE primarily caters to the needs of enterprises and organizations looking to secure their networks and enforce policies for user access. In contrast, DPDK is more focused on enhancing packet processing speeds and overall network performance, making it ideal for telecommunications and network function virtualization (NFV) applications.

**3. Licensing**: Cisco ISE is a proprietary solution offered by Cisco Systems, which means users need to purchase licenses to use the product. On the other hand, DPDK is an open-source project released under the Apache License 2.0, allowing users to freely modify and distribute the software.

**4. Programming Language**: Cisco ISE is primarily developed using Java and runs on a dedicated hardware appliance. In contrast, DPDK is written in C programming language and can be deployed on a wide range of hardware platforms, including x86, ARM, and PowerPC architectures.

**5. Control vs. Data Plane**: Cisco ISE is more focused on network policy enforcement, access control, and identity services (control plane functionality). On the other hand, DPDK is designed to accelerate packet processing in the data plane, optimizing data movement within the network.

**6. Protocol Support**: Cisco ISE supports various network protocols for authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA), including RADIUS, TACACS+, and LDAP. DPDK, on the other hand, is more focused on lower-level packet processing and does not provide built-in support for AAA protocols.

In Summary, Cisco ISE focuses on network access control and policy enforcement with scalability, while DPDK optimizes packet processing performance on commodity hardware with a focus on data plane acceleration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DPDK
DPDK
Cisco ISE
Cisco ISE

DPDK is the Data Plane Development Kit that consists of libraries to accelerate packet processing workloads running on a wide variety of CPU architectures.

A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.

Receive and Send Packets Within the Minimum Number of CPU Cycles; Develop Fast Packet Capture Algorithms; Run Third-Party Fast Path Stacks
Gain visibility with context and control; Extend zero trust to contain threats; Accelerate value of existing solutions; Take the next step in secure access
Statistics
Stacks
19
Stacks
19
Followers
24
Followers
26
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to DPDK, Cisco ISE?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Wireshark

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

PRTG

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana