StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. Cisco ISE vs PRTG

Cisco ISE vs PRTG

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PRTG
PRTG
Stacks56
Followers66
Votes0
Cisco ISE
Cisco ISE
Stacks19
Followers26
Votes0

Cisco ISE vs PRTG: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Cisco ISE and PRTG

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Paessler PRTG Network Monitor (PRTG) are two essential tools in the realm of network management. Here are the key differences between Cisco ISE and PRTG:

1. **Functionality**: Cisco ISE is primarily focused on network access control and enforcing security policies, while PRTG is more geared towards monitoring network performance and availability. Cisco ISE provides features for authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA), while PRTG offers a comprehensive set of sensors for monitoring various network parameters such as bandwidth, traffic, and device health.

2. **Deployment and Scalability**: Cisco ISE is typically deployed in larger enterprise environments to manage network access and enforce security policies across the organization. On the other hand, PRTG is suitable for organizations of all sizes and can be easily scaled to monitor networks of varying complexities. PRTG offers a flexible licensing model that allows users to add more sensors as their network grows.

3. **Integration Capabilities**: Cisco ISE integrates seamlessly with other Cisco security products and networking devices, enabling centralized management and enforcement of security policies across the network infrastructure. PRTG, on the other hand, offers a wide range of third-party integrations with various systems and applications, making it a versatile tool for monitoring diverse IT environments.

4. **Alerting and Reporting**: Cisco ISE provides real-time alerts and notifications for security incidents and policy violations, allowing administrators to respond promptly to potential threats. PRTG also offers robust alerting capabilities but is more focused on monitoring network performance metrics and generating detailed reports for analysis and troubleshooting.

5. **User Interface**: Cisco ISE has a user-friendly interface designed for security administrators to easily configure and manage network access policies. In comparison, PRTG features a customizable dashboard that allows users to create personalized views of network data and performance metrics, making it easier to track and analyze critical network information.

6. **Cost**: Cisco ISE is typically a more expensive solution, tailored for enterprise security needs and compliance requirements. PRTG, on the other hand, offers a cost-effective approach to network monitoring with flexible licensing options and a straightforward pricing model based on the number of sensors deployed.

In Summary, Cisco ISE focuses on network access control and security enforcement, while PRTG specializes in network monitoring and performance management, offering scalability, integration capabilities, alerting, reporting, user interface, and cost advantages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PRTG
PRTG
Cisco ISE
Cisco ISE

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the environment that everyone and everything is connecting to: the workplace. It enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that empowers software-defined access and automated network segmentation within IT and OT environments.

FLEXIBLE ALERTING; MULTIPLE USER INTERFACES; CLUSTER FAILOVER SOLUTION;
Gain visibility with context and control; Extend zero trust to contain threats; Accelerate value of existing solutions; Take the next step in secure access
Statistics
Stacks
56
Stacks
19
Followers
66
Followers
26
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    Running on windows
  • 1
    Graphs are static
  • 1
    Poor search capabilities
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grafana
Grafana
Slack
Slack
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PRTG, Cisco ISE?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Wireshark

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana