StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Cisco Umbrella vs Cisco WSA

Cisco Umbrella vs Cisco WSA

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cisco WSA
Cisco WSA
Stacks6
Followers19
Votes0
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Umbrella
Stacks10
Followers10
Votes0

Cisco Umbrella vs Cisco WSA: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Cisco Umbrella and Cisco WSA. Both solutions are offered by Cisco and provide different functionalities for network security. Understanding the distinctions between these two products can help organizations make informed decisions about their network security needs.

  1. Deployment Model: Cisco Umbrella is a cloud-based security service, while Cisco WSA (Web Security Appliance) is an on-premises hardware appliance. Umbrella operates by redirecting DNS requests to its global network of servers, allowing for quick and scalable deployment across the organization's network. On the other hand, WSA requires physical deployment of hardware appliances within the network infrastructure.

  2. Security Scope: Cisco Umbrella primarily focuses on protecting devices against malware, phishing, and other security threats by enforcing security policies at the DNS layer. It provides secure web gateway functionality to protect against internet threats before they reach the network. In contrast, Cisco WSA is a more comprehensive web security solution that includes anti-malware protection, URL filtering, data loss prevention, and advanced threat defense capabilities. It offers a broader range of security features for organizations concerned with web-based attacks and web traffic control.

  3. Scalability: Cisco Umbrella is highly scalable as it is a cloud-based service. It can handle large volumes of DNS requests and protect devices across multiple locations without requiring additional on-premises infrastructure. In contrast, Cisco WSA's scalability is limited by the capacity of the hardware appliances installed within the organization's network. Scaling WSA requires adding more physical appliances, which may involve higher costs and deployment complexity.

  4. Management and Maintenance: Cisco Umbrella provides a centralized management console that allows for easy policy configuration, monitoring, and reporting across all devices and locations. Being a cloud service, it eliminates the need for organizations to perform software updates or hardware maintenance. On the other hand, Cisco WSA requires manual maintenance and software updates for the installed appliances. Configuration and management of WSA may involve more complex processes compared to the centralized management offered by Umbrella.

  5. Deployment Flexibility: Cisco Umbrella provides flexibility in terms of device and location coverage, as it can protect devices both on and off the corporate network. This is especially useful for remote users and mobile devices connecting from outside the organization's premises. In contrast, Cisco WSA is primarily designed for protecting devices connected within the organization's network perimeter. It offers granular control over web traffic and policies for devices connected locally.

  6. Performance Impact: Cisco Umbrella operates at the DNS layer to enforce security policies and redirect traffic to its cloud infrastructure. This redirection can introduce a slight delay in DNS resolution, although the impact on overall user experience is minimal. In contrast, Cisco WSA intercepts and inspects web traffic at the network perimeter, which can introduce latency depending on the traffic volume and configuration. Organizations with high-performance requirements may need to consider the potential impact of WSA on network performance.

In summary, Cisco Umbrella is a cloud-based security service focused on DNS-level protection against malware and internet threats, providing scalability, flexibility, and centralized management. On the other hand, Cisco WSA is an on-premises web security appliance offering comprehensive web security features, granular control over web traffic, and integration with other network devices. The choice between Umbrella and WSA depends on specific security needs, deployment preferences, and scalability requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cisco WSA
Cisco WSA
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Umbrella

Advanced threats can hide on legitimate websites. Users may inadvertently put your organization at risk by clicking where they shouldn't. It protects you by automatically blocking risky sites and testing unknown sites before allowing users to click on them.

It offers flexible, cloud-delivered security when and how you need it. It combines multiple security functions into one solution, so you can extend protection to devices, remote users, and distributed locations anywhere. It is the easiest way to effectively protect your users everywhere in minutes.

Strong, effective protection; Granular controls; Detailed reporting; Flexible deployment options; Integrated security architecture
Flexible security protection on and off network; Consistent policies across remote locations; Better performance and user satisfaction everywhere;Multiple security functions in a single cloud security service
Statistics
Stacks
6
Stacks
10
Followers
19
Followers
10
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to Cisco WSA, Cisco Umbrella?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope