StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Clickhouse vs DuckDB

Clickhouse vs DuckDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Clickhouse
Clickhouse
Stacks433
Followers543
Votes85
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

Clickhouse vs DuckDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Clickhouse and DuckDB, two popular database management systems. We will provide specific information on how they differ from each other.

  1. Performance and Scalability: Clickhouse is known for its exceptional performance and scalability. It is optimized for handling large amounts of data and allows fast query execution on distributed systems. On the other hand, DuckDB focuses on providing strong analytical performance on single machines, allowing for efficient use of limited resources.

  2. Data Storage and Compression: Clickhouse uses a column-oriented storage format, which is efficient for analytical workloads as it allows for selective column access and minimizes disk I/O. It also provides built-in data compression techniques like LZ4 and ZSTD, enabling efficient data storage and retrieval. DuckDB, on the other hand, uses a row-oriented storage format, which is better suited for transactional workloads with smaller data sets.

  3. Query Language Support: Clickhouse supports a wide range of SQL features and provides a rich set of functions and operators for querying and manipulating data. It also supports a subset of the SQL Alter, Insert, Update, and Delete statements. In contrast, DuckDB offers support for a larger subset of the SQL standard, including advanced features like window functions and common table expressions.

  4. Concurrency Control: Clickhouse has a built-in concurrency control mechanism that allows multiple queries to be executed simultaneously. It provides various isolation levels to ensure data consistency and supports multi-threaded query execution. DuckDB, on the other hand, focuses on single-threaded execution, which simplifies concurrency control and reduces contention for resources.

  5. Compatibility and Integration: Clickhouse is designed to work seamlessly with other big data tools and integrates well with popular frameworks like Apache Kafka, Apache Spark, and Apache Hadoop. It also provides drivers for various programming languages, making it easier to interact with the database. DuckDB, on the other hand, aims to provide easy integration with existing data analysis and visualization tools, offering compatibility with popular libraries like Pandas and R.

  6. Community and Adoption: Clickhouse has gained significant popularity and has a large and active community of users and contributors. It is widely adopted by companies dealing with big data analytics and processing. DuckDB, being a relatively newer project, is rapidly gaining attention and has a growing community that actively contributes to its development and improvement.

In summary, Clickhouse is a highly scalable and performant database management system optimized for analytical workloads on distributed systems. DuckDB, on the other hand, focuses on providing strong analytical performance on single machines with a more extensive SQL feature set, emphasizing compatibility and integration with existing data analysis tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Clickhouse
Clickhouse
DuckDB
DuckDB

It allows analysis of data that is updated in real time. It offers instant results in most cases: the data is processed faster than it takes to create a query.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

-
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
Stacks
433
Stacks
49
Followers
543
Followers
60
Votes
85
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Fast, very very fast
  • 11
    Good compression ratio
  • 7
    Horizontally scalable
  • 6
    Utilizes all CPU resources
  • 5
    Great CLI
Cons
  • 5
    Slow insert operations
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to Clickhouse, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase