Cloudflare WAF vs Openswan

Overview

Openswan

Stacks3

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars868

Forks213

Cloudflare WAF

Stacks33

Followers53

Votes0

Cloudflare WAF vs Openswan: What are the differences?

Implementation: Cloudflare WAF is a cloud-based web application firewall that uses a global network to protect websites from various online threats, while Openswan is an open-source, standards-based IPsec VPN implementation for Linux. Cloudflare WAF is managed and hosted by Cloudflare, making it easier to implement, whereas Openswan requires downloading, configuring, and managing on the user's own infrastructure.
Focus: Cloudflare WAF primarily focuses on protecting websites from attacks like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and DDoS attacks. It offers security features like DDoS protection, bot mitigation, and rate limiting. On the other hand, Openswan is designed for secure communication over the internet, specifically for setting up virtual private networks (VPNs) using IPsec protocols.
Deployment: Cloudflare WAF can be quickly deployed through DNS configuration or by changing the website's nameservers, making it accessible to a wide range of users without the need for extensive technical knowledge. Openswan, however, requires manual configuration and setup on Linux servers, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Cost: Cloudflare WAF offers different pricing tiers based on the level of protection and additional features required by the user, ranging from free plans to enterprise-grade solutions with advanced security capabilities. Openswan, being open-source, is generally free to use but may incur costs for maintenance, support, and additional security features.
Scalability: Cloudflare WAF is designed to scale effortlessly with websites of all sizes, utilizing its global network to handle increased traffic and security demands. On the contrary, Openswan scalability may be limited by the resources available on the user's server and may require additional configurations for optimal performance in larger environments.

In Summary, Cloudflare WAF and Openswan differ in implementation, focus, deployment, cost, and scalability, catering to distinct security needs and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Openswan	Cloudflare WAF
It is an IPsec implementation for Linux. It has support for most of the extensions (RFC + IETF drafts) related to IPsec, including IKEv2, X.509 Digital Certificates, NAT Traversal, and many others.	An intelligent, integrated and scalable solution to protect your business-critical web applications from malicious attacks, with no changes to your existing infrastructure.
IPsec;IKEv2;X.509 Digital Certificates;NAT Traversal	Intuitive dashboard; Terraform integration; Threat intelligence
Statistics
GitHub Stars 868	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 213	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3	Stacks 33
Followers 13	Followers 53
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Fedora Ubuntu Debian	Terraform

What are some alternatives to Openswan, Cloudflare WAF?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Cloudflare WAF vs Openswan: What are the differences?

Implementation: Cloudflare WAF is a cloud-based web application firewall that uses a global network to protect websites from various online threats, while Openswan is an open-source, standards-based IPsec VPN implementation for Linux. Cloudflare WAF is managed and hosted by Cloudflare, making it easier to implement, whereas Openswan requires downloading, configuring, and managing on the user's own infrastructure.
Focus: Cloudflare WAF primarily focuses on protecting websites from attacks like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and DDoS attacks. It offers security features like DDoS protection, bot mitigation, and rate limiting. On the other hand, Openswan is designed for secure communication over the internet, specifically for setting up virtual private networks (VPNs) using IPsec protocols.
Deployment: Cloudflare WAF can be quickly deployed through DNS configuration or by changing the website's nameservers, making it accessible to a wide range of users without the need for extensive technical knowledge. Openswan, however, requires manual configuration and setup on Linux servers, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Cost: Cloudflare WAF offers different pricing tiers based on the level of protection and additional features required by the user, ranging from free plans to enterprise-grade solutions with advanced security capabilities. Openswan, being open-source, is generally free to use but may incur costs for maintenance, support, and additional security features.
Scalability: Cloudflare WAF is designed to scale effortlessly with websites of all sizes, utilizing its global network to handle increased traffic and security demands. On the contrary, Openswan scalability may be limited by the resources available on the user's server and may require additional configurations for optimal performance in larger environments.

In Summary, Cloudflare WAF and Openswan differ in implementation, focus, deployment, cost, and scalability, catering to distinct security needs and use cases.