Cloudflare WAF vs Tenable.sc

Overview

Cloudflare WAF

Stacks34

Followers53

Votes0

Tenable.sc

Stacks21

Followers33

Votes0

Cloudflare WAF vs Tenable.sc: What are the differences?

Deployment: Cloudflare WAF is a cloud-based security solution, which means it is easily scalable and can be implemented without any additional hardware. On the other hand, Tenable.sc typically requires on-premise deployment, making it suitable for organizations that prefer to have full control over their security infrastructure.
Scope of Protection: Cloudflare WAF primarily focuses on protecting web applications from a wide range of attacks, including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and DDoS attacks. In contrast, Tenable.sc offers comprehensive vulnerability management and compliance monitoring across the entire IT infrastructure, helping organizations identify and remediate security gaps proactively.
Real-time Analysis: Cloudflare WAF provides real-time analysis of web traffic and applies security rules dynamically to block malicious requests instantly. Meanwhile, Tenable.sc offers in-depth vulnerability scanning and analysis that provides insights into system weaknesses for informed decision-making.
Cost Structure: Cloudflare WAF operates on a subscription-based pricing model that allows organizations to pay for the services they utilize. On the other hand, Tenable.sc follows a licensing model based on the number of assets being monitored, which can be more cost-effective for larger organizations with extensive IT environments.
Integration Capabilities: Cloudflare WAF seamlessly integrates with various cloud services and applications, making it easier to incorporate security measures across different platforms. Tenable.sc, on the other hand, offers integration with a wide range of security tools and platforms for a holistic security approach.
Reporting and Analytics: Cloudflare WAF provides detailed analytics and reporting on web traffic and security events, helping organizations track and analyze security incidents effectively. Meanwhile, Tenable.sc offers comprehensive reporting capabilities on vulnerabilities, compliance status, and overall security posture for better risk management and decision-making.

In Summary, Cloudflare WAF is a cloud-based web application firewall focused on protecting web applications, while Tenable.sc offers comprehensive vulnerability management and compliance monitoring for the entire IT infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloudflare WAF	Tenable.sc
An intelligent, integrated and scalable solution to protect your business-critical web applications from malicious attacks, with no changes to your existing infrastructure.	It is a comprehensive vulnerability analysis solution that provides complete visibility into the security posture of your distributed and complex IT infrastructure.
Intuitive dashboard; Terraform integration; Threat intelligence	Managed On-Prem; Real-time, continuous assessment of your security; Discovers unknown assets and vulnerabilities
Statistics
Stacks 34	Stacks 21
Followers 53	Followers 33
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Terraform	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Cloudflare WAF, Tenable.sc?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Cloudflare WAF vs Tenable.sc: What are the differences?

Deployment: Cloudflare WAF is a cloud-based security solution, which means it is easily scalable and can be implemented without any additional hardware. On the other hand, Tenable.sc typically requires on-premise deployment, making it suitable for organizations that prefer to have full control over their security infrastructure.
Scope of Protection: Cloudflare WAF primarily focuses on protecting web applications from a wide range of attacks, including SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and DDoS attacks. In contrast, Tenable.sc offers comprehensive vulnerability management and compliance monitoring across the entire IT infrastructure, helping organizations identify and remediate security gaps proactively.
Real-time Analysis: Cloudflare WAF provides real-time analysis of web traffic and applies security rules dynamically to block malicious requests instantly. Meanwhile, Tenable.sc offers in-depth vulnerability scanning and analysis that provides insights into system weaknesses for informed decision-making.
Cost Structure: Cloudflare WAF operates on a subscription-based pricing model that allows organizations to pay for the services they utilize. On the other hand, Tenable.sc follows a licensing model based on the number of assets being monitored, which can be more cost-effective for larger organizations with extensive IT environments.
Integration Capabilities: Cloudflare WAF seamlessly integrates with various cloud services and applications, making it easier to incorporate security measures across different platforms. Tenable.sc, on the other hand, offers integration with a wide range of security tools and platforms for a holistic security approach.
Reporting and Analytics: Cloudflare WAF provides detailed analytics and reporting on web traffic and security events, helping organizations track and analyze security incidents effectively. Meanwhile, Tenable.sc offers comprehensive reporting capabilities on vulnerabilities, compliance status, and overall security posture for better risk management and decision-making.

Cloudflare WAF vs Tenable.sc

Overview